Literature DB >> 7803360

Contrast sensitivity testing in clinical practice.

M J Moseley1, A R Hill.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1994        PMID： 7803360      PMCID： PMC504940          DOI： 10.1136/bjo.78.10.795

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN： 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


× No keyword cloud information.
  20 in total

1.  Studies of psychophysical methods for measuring visual thresholds.

Authors:  H R BLACKWELL
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1952-09

2.  Vistech VCTS 6500 charts--within- and between-session reliability.

Authors:  B C Reeves; J M Wood; A R Hill
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Clinical grading and the effects of scaling.

Authors:  I L Bailey; M A Bullimore; T W Raasch; H R Taylor
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Changes in colour contrast sensitivity associated with operating argon lasers.

Authors:  K Gündüz; G B Arden
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Some methodological problems in testing visual function.

Authors:  P A Aspinall
Journal:  Mod Probl Ophthalmol       Date:  1974

6.  On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images.

Authors:  C Blakemore; F W Campbell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Role of the contrast sensitivity function in clinical practice.

Authors:  J Verbaken
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1987-04

8.  Reliability of the Cambridge Low Contrast Gratings.

Authors:  H S Jones; M J Moseley; J R Thompson
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution.

Authors:  F W Campbell; D G Green
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1965-12       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  A simple grating test for contrast sensitivity: preliminary results indicate value in screening for glaucoma.

Authors:  G B Arden; J J Jacobson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 4.799
View more
  7 in total

1.  Visual function after penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: a prospective longitudinal evaluation.

Authors:  A Brahma; F Ennis; R Harper; A Ridgway; A Tullo
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 2.  Management of cataract.

Authors:  R Dickson; A Eastwood; P Gill; A Melville; S O'Meara; T Sheldon
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1996-09

3.  Glaucoma-Associated Visual Task Performance and Vision-Related Quality of Life in South India.

Authors:  Chelsea L Reighard; Manju R Pillai; Sujani Shroff; George L Spaeth; Stephen G Schilling; Sheryl S Wizov; Joshua D Stein; Alan L Robin; Vidya Raja; Joshua R Ehrlich
Journal:  Ophthalmol Glaucoma       Date:  2019-06-18

4.  Contrast sensitivity in 10 year old preterm and full term children: a population based study.

Authors:  E Larsson; A Rydberg; G Holmström
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Contrast sensitivity testing in clinical practice.

Authors:  L Hyvärinen
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Collecting Objective Measures of Visual and Auditory Function in a National in-Home Survey of Older Adults.

Authors:  Mengyao Hu; Vicki A Freedman; Joshua R Ehrlich; Nicholas S Reed; Catherine Billington; Judith D Kasper
Journal:  J Surv Stat Methodol       Date:  2021-02-14

7.  Predicting individual contrast sensitivity functions from acuity and letter contrast sensitivity measurements.

Authors:  Steven M Thurman; Pinakin Gunvant Davey; Kaydee Lynn McCray; Violeta Paronian; Aaron R Seitz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.240
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.