Literature DB >> 7802077

The accuracy of prenatal ultrasonography in detecting congenital anomalies.

L F Gonçalves1, P Jeanty, J M Piper.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of prenatal ultrasonography in detecting congenital anomalies. STUDY
DESIGN: We studied all singleton births or fetal deaths with one or more congenital defects delivered during the study period who had had one or more ultrasonographic examinations performed at or after 16 weeks' gestation and a random sample of defect-free newborns similarly examined by ultrasonography. Congenital anomalies reported on either the infants' postdelivery medical record or the fetal autopsy report were our standard. Prenatal ultrasonographic findings reported during gestation and therefore "blind" to the postdelivery outcome were then compared with the standard.
RESULTS: The overall sensitivity of ultrasonography in detecting defects was 53%. The overall specificity was 99%. Ultrasonography proved to be highly sensitive (89%) for prevalent lethal malformations. However, serious cardiac defects, microcephalus, and many musculoskeletal deformities were missed by ultrasonography.
CONCLUSION: Ultrasonography is sensitive in detecting many lethal malformations. However, a negative prenatal ultrasonographic examination does not provide absolute assurance that a fetus is defect free.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7802077     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(94)90411-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of prenatal diagnosis of congenital gastro-intestinal atresias.

Authors:  C Stoll; Y Alembik; B Dott; M P Roth
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 2.  Global Birth Prevalence of Spina Bifida by Folic Acid Fortification Status: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Callie A M Atta; Kirsten M Fiest; Alexandra D Frolkis; Nathalie Jette; Tamara Pringsheim; Christine St Germaine-Smith; Thilinie Rajapakse; Gilaad G Kaplan; Amy Metcalfe
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound Scanning for Prenatal Microcephaly in the context of Zika Virus Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ezinne C Chibueze; Alex J Q Parsons; Katharina da Silva Lopes; Takemoto Yo; Toshiyuki Swa; Chie Nagata; Nobuyuki Horita; Naho Morisaki; Olukunmi O Balogun; Amarjargal Dagvadorj; Erika Ota; Rintaro Mori; Olufemi T Oladapo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  The cost-effectiveness of neonatal versus prenatal screening for congenital toxoplasmosis.

Authors:  Christine Binquet; Catherine Lejeune; Valérie Seror; François Peyron; Anne-Claire Bertaux; Olivier Scemama; Catherine Quantin; Sophie Béjean; Eileen Stillwaggon; Martine Wallon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.