Literature DB >> 7800863

Evaluating risk communications: completing and correcting mental models of hazardous processes, Part II.

A Bostrom1, C J Atman, B Fischhoff, M G Morgan.   

Abstract

We propose a decision-analytic framework, called the mental models approach, for evaluating the impact of risk communications. It employs multiple evaluation methods, including think-aloud protocol analysis, problem solving, and a true-false test that allows respondents to express uncertainty about their answers. The approach is illustrated in empirical comparisons of three brochures about indoor radon.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7800863     DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00290.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  8 in total

Review 1.  A review of human factors principles for the design and implementation of medication safety alerts in clinical information systems.

Authors:  Shobha Phansalkar; Judy Edworthy; Elizabeth Hellier; Diane L Seger; Angela Schedlbauer; Anthony J Avery; David W Bates
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Vaccine risk perception among reporters of autism after vaccination: vaccine adverse event reporting system 1990-2001.

Authors:  Emily Jane Woo; Robert Ball; Ann Bostrom; Sean V Shadomy; Leslie K Ball; Geoffrey Evans; Miles Braun
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  The effect of misunderstanding the chemical properties of environmental contaminants on exposure beliefs: a case involving dioxins.

Authors:  Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Angela Turkelson; Alfred Franzblau; Julia K Diebol; Lindsay A Allerton; Edith A Parker
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  The Pesticide Risk Beliefs Inventory: a quantitative instrument for the assessment of beliefs about pesticide risks.

Authors:  Catherine E LePrevost; Margaret R Blanchard; W Gregory Cope
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Conceptual obstacles to making use of four smoking-cessation strategies: What reasons do light smokers give for rejecting strategies?

Authors:  Michael P Ryan; Jennifer J Hinojosa
Journal:  Health Psychol Open       Date:  2015-12-23

6.  Under what conditions can a nonprescription drug label serve as refutation text? The role of directed attention and processing strategy.

Authors:  Michael P Ryan; Paula L Costa; Aubrey B Cruz
Journal:  Health Psychol Open       Date:  2017-09-06

7.  Ten most important accomplishments in risk analysis, 1980-2010.

Authors:  Michael Greenberg; Charles Haas; Anthony Cox; Karen Lowrie; Katherine McComas; Warner North
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.000

8.  Does the Drug Facts Label for nonprescription drugs meet its design objectives? A new procedure for assessing label effectiveness.

Authors:  Michael P Ryan; Reagan N Costello-White
Journal:  Health Psychol Open       Date:  2017-08-02
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.