Literature DB >> 7800456

Intussusception: characteristic radiolucencies on the abdominal radiograph.

J M Lee1, H Kim, J Y Byun, H G Lee, C Y Kim, K S Shinn, Y W Bahk.   

Abstract

Six hundred and twenty-five sets of supine and erect abdominal radiographs of 288 patients with the confirmed diagnosis of intussusception (315 episodes) and 310 patients without intussusception were reviewed retrospectively to determine the characteristic radiographic features of intussusception. Among the patients with intussusception, 155 episodes (49%) showed a soft tissue mass and nearly half of these (71) showed characteristic radiolucencies (target, crescentic, or amorphous) in the soft tissue mass. Thirty-five episodes showed the radiolucencies on both the supine and erect radiographs; in 16 cases the type of radiolucency differed on the two films. In patients without intussusception, abnormal radiolucencies were seen in only seven cases (2.3%). Computed tomography performed prospectively in five patients showed the radiolucencies in the soft tissue mass to be intussuscepted mesenteric fat. We conclude that abnormal radiolucencies in the soft tissue mass on plain radiographs are characteristic of intussusception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7800456     DOI: 10.1007/bf02015462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN: 0301-0449


  10 in total

1.  PLAIN FILM FINDINGS IN INTUSSUSCEPTION.

Authors:  M LEVINE; S SCHWARTZ; I KATZ; H BURKO; J RABINOWITZ
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1964-09       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  CONVENTIONAL ROENTGENOGRAPHY IN DIAGNOSIS OF INTUSSUSCEPTION IN CHILDREN.

Authors:  H BOLIN
Journal:  Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh)       Date:  1964-01

3.  A sign of intussusception.

Authors:  H JACKSON
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1953-06       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Multiple concentric ring sign in the ultrasonographic diagnosis of intussusception.

Authors:  S Holt; E Samuel
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1978-08-31

5.  Plain film diagnosis of intussusception: prevalence of the target sign.

Authors:  J F Ratcliffe; S Fong; I Cheong; P O'Connell
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Ultrasonic features of ileocecal intussusception.

Authors:  P Skaane; A Skjennald
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 0.910

7.  The ultrasonic appearance of ileocolic intussusception.

Authors:  M E Morin; D H Blumenthal; A Tan; Y P Li
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  1981 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.910

8.  Intussusception: additional observations on the plain radiograph.

Authors:  S J White; C E Blane
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Reliability of the abdominal plain film diagnosis in pediatric patients with suspected intussusception.

Authors:  O Eklöf; H Hartelius
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1980-07

10.  Intussusception in infants and children: diagnosis and therapy.

Authors:  G S Bisset; D R Kirks
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 11.105

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Intussusception in children: 11-year experience in Vladivostok.

Authors:  A N Shapkina; V V Shapkin; I V Nelubov; L T Pryanishena
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Validity of plain films in intussusception.

Authors:  J Alberto Hernandez; Leonard E Swischuk; Carlos A Angel
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2004-05-15

3.  The role of plain radiography in assessing intussusception with vascular compromise in children.

Authors:  Wan-Liang Guo; Jian Wang; Min Zhou; Mao Sheng; Lin Fang
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 3.318

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.