Literature DB >> 7800356

Visual morbidity in giant cell arteritis. Clinical characteristics and prognosis for vision.

G T Liu1, J S Glaser, N J Schatz, J L Smith.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To characterize visual morbidity in giant cell arteritis and to assess prognosis with respect to treatment.
METHODS: Record review of 185 patients with coded diagnosis of giant cell (cranial) arteritis examined at the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute from January 1, 1980, to January 31, 1993.
RESULTS: Forty-five patients with biopsy-proven giant cell arteritis had visual symptoms, and 41 individuals (63 eyes) lost vision. The visual loss was unilateral in 19 patients (46%), sequential in 15 (37%), and simultaneous in 7 (17%). Anterior ischemic optic neuropathy developed in 88% of eyes, visual acuity was 20/200 or worse in 70%, 21% had no light perception, and the majority of field defects in testable eyes, aside from central scotomas associated with loss, showed altitudinal or arcuate patterns. Six patients lost vision during corticosteroid therapy for systemic symptoms of giant cell arteritis, whereas in 39 patients visual symptoms prompted steroid treatment. For visual symptoms, 25 patients received intravenous methylprednisolone, whereas 20 received oral prednisone alone. In the 41 patients with visual loss, vision was unchanged in 20 (49%), it worsened in 7 (17%), and it improved in 14 (34%). Subsequent fellow eye involvement was observed only with oral therapy, and a greater percentage of patients (9/23 [39%] versus 5/18 [28%]) improved after intravenous treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: In the authors' series, patients with visual loss due to giant cell arteritis had a 34% chance for some improvement in visual function after corticosteroid treatment. Intravenous therapy may diminish the likelihood of fellow eye involvement and was associated with a slightly better prognosis for visual improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7800356     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(94)31102-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  28 in total

1.  Ophthaproblem. Anterior ischemic optic neuropathy.

Authors:  S Sharma
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Heparin therapy in giant cell arteritis.

Authors:  L M Buono; R Foroozan; M de Virgiliis; P J Savino
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Clinical trials in giant cell arteritis.

Authors:  Luis R Espinoza
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.592

4.  Epidemiology of giant-cell arteritis in an Arab population: a 22-year study.

Authors:  Imtiaz A Chaudhry; Farrukh A Shamsi; Elsanusi Elzaridi; Yonca O Arat; Thomas M Bosley; Fenwick C Riley
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 5.  The treatment of giant cell arteritis.

Authors:  J Alexander Fraser; Cornelia M Weyand; Nancy J Newman; Valérie Biousse
Journal:  Rev Neurol Dis       Date:  2008

6.  Diagnosis and management of migraine. Differential diagnosis may be different in patients presenting to an ophthalmologist.

Authors:  A D Brown; P M Dodson; J R Ainsworth
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-09-14

Review 7.  Review of Giant cell arteritis.

Authors:  Joseph G Chacko; J Anthony Chacko; Michael W Salter
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-11-01

Review 8.  Giant cell arteritis: ophthalmic manifestations of a systemic disease.

Authors:  Elisabeth De Smit; Eoin O'Sullivan; David A Mackey; Alex W Hewitt
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Giant Cell Arteritis.

Authors:  Jennifer K. Hall; Laura J. Balcer
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.598

10.  Clinical approach to optic neuropathies.

Authors:  Raed Behbehani
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.