Literature DB >> 7799773

Physiological comparison of uphill roller skiing: diagonal stride versus double pole.

M D Hoffman1, P S Clifford, P B Watts, K M Drobish, T P Gibbons, V S Newbury, J E Sulentic, S W Mittelstadt, K P O'Hagan.   

Abstract

The physiological responses to treadmill roller skiing with the double pole (DP) and diagonal stride (DS) techniques were compared at 1.7% and 7.1% grades among eight cross-country ski racers. Oxygen uptake (VO2) requirements were found to be lower (P < 0.05) for DP at the 1.7% grade, but similar at the 7.1% grade. In contrast, ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) and percentages of technique-specific peak VO2 were similar between techniques at the 1.7% grade, and lower (P < 0.05) for DS at the 7.1% grade. RPE and percentages of technique-specific peak VO2 were strongly correlated (r = 0.89). The primary findings indicate that 1) the economies for DP and DS are dependent upon the incline, 2) it is possible for the economy of DP to be greater than DS although the percentages of technique-specific peak VO2 are similar, and 3) the perceived effort associated with the use of DP and DS reflects the percentage of technique-specific peak VO2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7799773

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  10 in total

1.  Metabolic rate and gross efficiency at high work rates in world class and national level sprint skiers.

Authors:  Øyvind Sandbakk; Hans-Christer Holmberg; Stig Leirdal; Gertjan Ettema
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Does the amount of exercising muscle alter the aerobic demand of dynamic exercise?

Authors:  M D Hoffman; K M Kassay; A I Zeni; P S Clifford
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1996

3.  Automated identification and evaluation of subtechniques in classical-style roller skiing.

Authors:  Yoshihisa Sakurai; Zenya Fujita; Yusuke Ishige
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  Ski skating technique and physiological responses across slopes and speeds.

Authors:  Bent Kvamme; Vidar Jakobsen; Svein Hetland; Gerald Smith
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-07-08       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  The Modern Double-Poling Technique Is Not More Energy Efficient Than the Old-Fashioned Double-Poling Technique at a Submaximal Work Intensity.

Authors:  Tomas Carlsson; Wilma Fjordell; Lars Wedholm; Mikael Swarén; Magnus Carlsson
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-05-18

6.  Physiological Comparisons of Elite Male Visma Ski Classics and National Level Cross-Country Skiers During Uphill Treadmill Roller Skiing.

Authors:  Edvard H Sagelv; Tina P Engseth; Sigurd Pedersen; Svein A Pettersen; Gunnar Mathisen; Kim A Heitmann; Boye Welde; Tor O Thomassen; Thomas L Stöggl
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  The influence of pole lengths on O2-cost, kinematics, and performance in double poling at high speeds before and after a training period with long poles.

Authors:  Thomas Losnegard; Ola Kristoffer Tosterud; Erik Trøen; Camilla Høivik Carlsen; Gøran Paulsen; Bjarne Rud
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Kinematic differences between uphill roller skiing and on-snow skiing using the V2 skating technique.

Authors:  Håvard Myklebust; Thomas Losnegard; Jostein Hallén
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 3.346

9.  Physiological responses and cycle characteristics during double-poling versus diagonal-stride roller-skiing in junior cross-country skiers.

Authors:  Erik P Andersson; Irina Hämberg; Paulo Cesar Do Nascimento Salvador; Kerry McGawley
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Pole lengths influence O2-cost during double poling in highly trained cross-country skiers.

Authors:  Camilla Høivik Carlsen; Bjarne Rud; Håvard Myklebust; Thomas Losnegard
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 3.078

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.