OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of continuous haemofiltration (CHF) on haemodynamics, gas exchange and core temperature in critically ill septic patients with acute renal failure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 20 patients (17 male, 3 female) ultrafiltration rate, core temperature, gas exchange and haemodynamic variables were measured at regular intervals during the first 48 h of haemofiltration. Baseline data were compared to those obtained 30 min after initiating CHF and also to those during hypothermia (if observed). MAIN RESULTS: Haemodynamic variables remained remarkably constant throughout the study period. In patients with a relatively low ultrafiltration rate (855 +/- 278 ml/h) temperature did not change, while in patients with a high ultrafiltration rate (1468 +/- 293 ml/h) core temperature significantly decreased from 37.6 +/- 0.9 degrees C to 34.8 +/- 0.8 degrees C (p < 0.001). There was a statistically significant correlation between temperature decrease and ultrafiltration rate (r = -0.68, Y = 1.8-0.003 X, p < 0.01). Hypothermic patients also showed a mean decrease in VO2 from 141 +/- 22 ml/min/m2 to 112 +/- 22 ml/min/m2 (p < 0.01) with a concomitant increase in PaO2 from 103 +/- 37 mmHg to 140 +/- 42 mmHg (p < 0.001) and in PvO2 from 35 +/- 4 mmHg to 41 +/- 5 mmHg (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: 1) Continuous haemofiltration does not cause significant alternations in haemodynamic variables. 2) Hypothermia frequently occurs in patients undergoing continuous haemofiltration with high ultrafiltration rates. These hypothermic patients show a reduction in VO2 leading to an increase in PvO2 and PaO2. This mild hypothermia in these circumstances has no evident deleterious effects.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of continuous haemofiltration (CHF) on haemodynamics, gas exchange and core temperature in critically ill septicpatients with acute renal failure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 20 patients (17 male, 3 female) ultrafiltration rate, core temperature, gas exchange and haemodynamic variables were measured at regular intervals during the first 48 h of haemofiltration. Baseline data were compared to those obtained 30 min after initiating CHF and also to those during hypothermia (if observed). MAIN RESULTS: Haemodynamic variables remained remarkably constant throughout the study period. In patients with a relatively low ultrafiltration rate (855 +/- 278 ml/h) temperature did not change, while in patients with a high ultrafiltration rate (1468 +/- 293 ml/h) core temperature significantly decreased from 37.6 +/- 0.9 degrees C to 34.8 +/- 0.8 degrees C (p < 0.001). There was a statistically significant correlation between temperature decrease and ultrafiltration rate (r = -0.68, Y = 1.8-0.003 X, p < 0.01). Hypothermicpatients also showed a mean decrease in VO2 from 141 +/- 22 ml/min/m2 to 112 +/- 22 ml/min/m2 (p < 0.01) with a concomitant increase in PaO2 from 103 +/- 37 mmHg to 140 +/- 42 mmHg (p < 0.001) and in PvO2 from 35 +/- 4 mmHg to 41 +/- 5 mmHg (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: 1) Continuous haemofiltration does not cause significant alternations in haemodynamic variables. 2) Hypothermia frequently occurs in patients undergoing continuous haemofiltration with high ultrafiltration rates. These hypothermicpatients show a reduction in VO2 leading to an increase in PvO2 and PaO2. This mild hypothermia in these circumstances has no evident deleterious effects.
Authors: Rinaldo Bellomo; Alan Cass; Louise Cole; Simon Finfer; Martin Gallagher; Joanne Lee; Serigne Lo; Colin McArthur; Shay McGuinness; John Myburgh; Robyn Norton; Carlos Scheinkestel; Steve Su Journal: Crit Care Date: 2014-03-14 Impact factor: 9.097