Literature DB >> 7798042

Establishing baseline data in cancer registration in northern England: implications for Health of the Nation targets.

M Kardara1, S Acquilla, D Forster, C McCarthy, J Stevenson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the completeness and accuracy of cancer surveillance data relevant to Health of the Nation targets.
DESIGN: A comparison of locally ascertained data on cancer with recorded cancer registry sources in selected diagnoses.
SETTING: The district of South West Durham within the Northern Regional Health Authority. PATIENTS: All patients with lung, skin, and malignant cervical cancer who were resident and diagnosed in the district or identified in the Northern Region Cancer Registry during the calendar period 1989-91. MAIN
RESULTS: Of 544 cases of cancer identified from all available sources, 448 (95.8%) were registered, ranging from 93.9% for malignant cervical cancer to 96.7% for skin cancer. In 448 cases which were both identified locally and registered, 53 (11.8%) showed disagreements between local sources and register data, involving classification of site and timing of registration. Twenty three cases were identified locally but were not registered, 22 registered but not identified locally, and 51 registered with the casenotes missing locally.
CONCLUSIONS: Any real achievement of Health of the Nation targets may be masked by changes over time in the accuracy and completeness of information systems. In assessing the achievement or otherwise of targets, it is important to be aware of any differences in the completeness and accuracy of the baseline data compared to future measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7798042      PMCID: PMC1060099          DOI: 10.1136/jech.49.2.150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  6 in total

1.  Use of cancer surveillance data for comparative analyses.

Authors:  S Wilson; P Prior; C B Woodman
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  1992-06

2.  Can you measure performance?

Authors:  J M Yates; M G Davidge
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-06-23

Review 3.  Registry evaluation methods: a review and case study.

Authors:  J Goldberg; H M Gelfand; P S Levy
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 6.222

4.  Towards achieving the Health of the Nation target for cervical cancer: accuracy of cancer registration.

Authors:  G Lancaster; T Moran; C Woodman
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  1994-03

5.  Assessing completeness of cancer registration in the north-western region of England by a method of independent comparison.

Authors:  U Nwene; A Smith
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  The completeness of cancer registration in England: an assessment from the Oxford-FPA contraceptive study.

Authors:  L Villard-Mackintosh; M P Coleman; M P Vessey
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 7.640

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of the diagnosis of leukaemia from death certificates, cancer registration and histological reports - implications for occupational case-control studies.

Authors:  L Rushton; H Romaniuk
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.