Literature DB >> 7797131

Detection of c-Ki-ras gene codon 12 mutations from pancreatic duct brushings in the diagnosis of pancreatic tumours.

J L Van Laethem1, P Vertongen, J Deviere, J Van Rampelbergh, F Rickaert, M Cremer, P Robberecht.   

Abstract

Differential diagnosis of pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis is sometimes difficult and cytological examination of brushings or aspirated material collected during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) remains disappointing. As point mutations in codon 12 of the c-Ki-ras 2 gene are found in most pancreatic adenocarcinoma and not in chronic pancreatitis, this study analysed prospectively the presence of these mutations in brushing samples collected during ERCP in 45 patients (26 males, 19 females) showing a dominant stricture of the main pancreatic duct at pancreatography: 24 with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, 16 with chronic pancreatitis, and five intraductal mucin hypersecreting neoplasms. Twenty of 45 patients presented equivocal ERCP findings that did not permit a definite diagnosis. Ki-ras mutations at codon 12 were detected using a rapid and sensitive method based on polymerase chain reaction mediated restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis and confirmed by direct sequencing of polymerase chain reaction products. Results were compared with those provided by routine brush cytology. A definitive diagnosis was established for each patient. Mutations were detected in 20 of 24 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (83%), but in none of the chronic pancreatitis patients and intraductal mucin hypersecreting neoplasms, irrespective of their location. By contrast, only 13 of 24 pancreatic adenocarcinoma (54%) were detected by conventional cytological examination, which yielded four false negative and seven non-contributive results. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of molecular biological and cytological methods were 83%-76%, 100-83%, and 90%-58%, respectively. Notably the mutations could be detected in six patients with small tumour size (< or = 2 cm). In conclusion, Ki-ras analysis performed on pancreatic brushing samples is an efficient procedure, more accurate than cytology in the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and highly specific in the differentiation between neoplastic and chronic inflammatory ductal changes, especially in patients showing inconclusive ERCP findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7797131      PMCID: PMC1382687          DOI: 10.1136/gut.36.5.781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  24 in total

1.  K-ras mutation is an early event in pancreatic duct carcinogenesis in the Syrian golden hamster.

Authors:  W L Cerny; K A Mangold; D G Scarpelli
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1992-08-15       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Staging of pancreatic and ampullary carcinoma by endoscopic ultrasonography. Comparison with conventional sonography, computed tomography, and angiography.

Authors:  T Rösch; C Braig; T Gain; S Feuerbach; J R Siewert; V Schusdziarra; M Classen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Detection of minority point mutations by modified PCR technique: a new approach for a sensitive diagnosis of tumor-progression markers.

Authors:  A Haliassos; J C Chomel; S Grandjouan; J Kruh; J C Kaplan; A Kitzis
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1989-10-25       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Endoscopic retrograde brush cytology. A new technique.

Authors:  R P Venu; J E Geenen; M Kini; W J Hogan; M Payne; G K Johnson; M J Schmalz
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 5.  Diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma. Imaging techniques and tumor markers.

Authors:  C Niederau; J H Grendell
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.327

6.  Ras gene mutations in intraductal papillary neoplasms of the pancreas. Analysis in five cases.

Authors:  M Tada; M Omata; M Ohto
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1991-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in differentiating pancreatic cancer coexisting with chronic pancreatitis.

Authors:  E Shemesh; A Czerniak; S Nass; E Klein
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Clinical application of ras gene mutation for diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  M Tada; M Omata; M Ohto
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Ki-ras oncogene activation in preinvasive pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  N R Lemoine; S Jain; C M Hughes; S L Staddon; B Maillet; P A Hall; G Klöppel
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  c-Ki-ras point mutations in ductectatic-type mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas.

Authors:  A Yanagisawa; Y Kato; K Ohtake; T Kitagawa; K Ohashi; M Hori; K Takagi; H Sugano
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  1991-10
View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Role of endoscopic ultrasound in the molecular diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Barbara Bournet; Marion Gayral; Jérôme Torrisani; Janick Selves; Pierre Cordelier; Louis Buscail
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  The use of molecular technology in the differentiation of pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis.

Authors:  S R Bramhall
Journal:  Int J Pancreatol       Date:  1998-04

3.  Quantitative analysis of ras gene mutation in pancreatic juice for diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  M Tada; T Teratani; Y Komatsu; T Kawabe; Y Shiratori; M Omata
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  "Mass-forming" pancreatitis masquerades as pancreatic carcinoma.

Authors:  K Yamaguchi; K Chijiiwa; S Saiki; A Nakatsuka; M Tanaka
Journal:  Int J Pancreatol       Date:  1996-08

5.  Clinical significance of K-ras oncogene activation in ampullary neoplasms.

Authors:  C H Chung; R E Wilentz; M M Polak; T B Ramsoekh; L A Noorduyn; D J Gouma; K Huibregtse; G J Offerhaus; R J Slebos
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Clinical validity of detecting K-ras mutations for the diagnosis of exocrine pancreatic cancer: a prospective study in a clinically-relevant spectrum of patients.

Authors:  Lucy A Parker; Miquel Porta; Blanca Lumbreras; Tomàs López; Luisa Guarner; Ildefonso Hernández-Aguado; Alfredo Carrato; Josep M Corominas; Juli Rifà; Esteve Fernandez; Joan Alguacil; Núria Malats; Francisco X Real
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-02-06       Impact factor: 8.082

7.  Detection of c-Ki-ras mutations in bile samples from patients with pancreatic and biliary cancers.

Authors:  S O'mahony; M Longfellow; M J McMahon; A T Axon; P Quirke
Journal:  Clin Mol Pathol       Date:  1995-12

8.  Loss of the transcription factor GLI1 identifies a signaling network in the tumor microenvironment mediating KRAS oncogene-induced transformation.

Authors:  Lisa D Mills; Yaqing Zhang; Ronald J Marler; Marta Herreros-Villanueva; Lizhi Zhang; Luciana L Almada; Fergus Couch; Cynthia Wetmore; Marina Pasca di Magliano; Martin E Fernandez-Zapico
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Evaluation of clinical relevance of examining K-ras, p16 and p53 mutations along with allelic losses at 9p and 18q in EUS-guided fine needle aspiration samples of patients with chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  C Salek; L Benesova; M Zavoral; V Nosek; L Kasperova; M Ryska; R Strnad; E Traboulsi; M Minarik
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Values of mutations of K-ras oncogene at codon 12 in detection of pancreatic cancer: 15-year experience.

Authors:  De-Qing Mu; You-Shu Peng; Qiao-Jian Xu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.