Literature DB >> 7795920

Assessment of the prevalence of psychiatric disorder in young adults.

R F Ferdinand1, M van der Reijden, F C Verhulst, J Nienhuis, R Giel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of different assessment procedures for determining prevalence rates of psychiatric disorder in young adults was investigated.
METHOD: In a two-stage multi-method procedure, the Young Adult Self-Report, the Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN), the Structured Interview for Personality Disorders (Revised), and the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) Scale were used to assess prevalence rates in 706 19-24-year-olds from the general population. Furthermore, individuals' subjective perception of distress and referral to mental health services were assessed.
RESULTS: The prevalence of any SCAN/DSM-III-R disorder was 19.3% (95% confidence interval: 11.2-27.4%). Most subjects who received a SCAN/DSM-III-R diagnosis were only mildly impaired. The highest prevalence rates of dysfunctioning (GAF score below 61) without referral to mental health services were for dissociative disorder (2.3%), sleep disorder (2.1%), alcohol dependence (1.3%) and affective disorder (1.8%).
CONCLUSION: Instruments that assess functional impairment in addition to DSM-III-R diagnoses are indispensable in prevalence studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7795920     DOI: 10.1192/bjp.166.4.480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0007-1250            Impact factor:   9.319


  3 in total

1.  The prevalence of self-reported problems in young adults from the general population.

Authors:  R F Ferdinand; F C Verhulst
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.328

2.  Self-reported psychopathology, adaptive functioning and sense of coherence, and psychiatric diagnosis among young men--a population-based study.

Authors:  Terja Ristkari; Andre Sourander; John Ronning; Hans Helenius
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2006-03-27       Impact factor: 4.519

Review 3.  Separating Fact from Fiction: An Empirical Examination of Six Myths About Dissociative Identity Disorder.

Authors:  Bethany L Brand; Vedat Sar; Pam Stavropoulos; Christa Krüger; Marilyn Korzekwa; Alfonso Martínez-Taboas; Warwick Middleton
Journal:  Harv Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.732

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.