Literature DB >> 7795662

In ovo transfection of chicken embryos using cationic liposomes.

C I Rosenblum1, H Y Chen.   

Abstract

It is reported that cationic liposomes are capable of transfecting embryos in unincubated fertile chicken eggs and that the cationic liposome, TransfectAce, has superior properties to Lipofectin. In order to determine the duration of expression of genes introduced in this way, embryos were transfected with an expression vector encoding the firefly luciferase cDNA under the control of the Rous sarcoma virus long terminal repeat (LTR). Luciferase activity could be observed consistently in day 3 embryos and activity was detectable up to day 8 of incubation. The relative expression of luciferase under the control of different viral promoters was compared in transfected chicken embryo fibroblasts and day 3 embryos. The cytomegalovirus immediate early promoter and the SV40 early promoter directed the highest amount of expression in fibroblasts while the Rous sarcoma virus LTR caused the highest amount of expression in embryos. Chicken embryo fibroblasts were transfected with the luciferase vector in order to examine duration of reporter gene expression in vitro. Luciferase expression was decreased exponentially over a 24-day period after which point luciferase activity could no longer be detected. These data suggest that stable integration of transfected DNA using liposomes is a rare event. Nevertheless, liposome-mediated transfection of embryos is suitable for the examination of promoter activity in vivo and may be a useful method to transfect genes to study embryonic development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7795662     DOI: 10.1007/bf01968784

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transgenic Res        ISSN: 0962-8819            Impact factor:   2.788


  29 in total

Review 1.  Retrovirus vectors: promise and reality.

Authors:  H M Temin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-11-24       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Avian retroviral expression of luciferase.

Authors:  E A Garber; C I Rosenblum; H T Chute; L M Scheidel; H Chen
Journal:  Virology       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 3.616

3.  Variability in preincubation embryo development in domestic fowl. 1. Effects of nest holding time and method of egg storage.

Authors:  G M Fasenko; F E Robinson; J G Armstrong; J S Church; R T Hardin; J N Petitte
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Production of transgenic birds.

Authors:  R M Shuman
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1991-09-15

5.  Nuclear events from fertilisation to the early cleavage stages in the domestic fowl (Gallus domesticus)

Authors:  M M Perry
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo.

Authors:  V HAMBURGER; H L HAMILTON
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  1951-01       Impact factor: 1.804

7.  Targeting genes: delivery and persistent expression of a foreign gene driven by mammalian regulatory elements in vivo.

Authors:  C H Wu; J M Wilson; G Y Wu
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1989-10-15       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Transgenic chickens: insertion of retroviral genes into the chicken germ line.

Authors:  D W Salter; E J Smith; S H Hughes; S E Wright; L B Crittenden
Journal:  Virology       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 3.616

9.  Efficient transfection of chicken cells by lipofection, and introduction of transfected blastodermal cells into the embryo.

Authors:  C L Brazolot; J N Petitte; R J Etches; A M Verrinder Gibbins
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 2.609

10.  A new cationic liposome reagent mediating nearly quantitative transfection of animal cells.

Authors:  J K Rose; L Buonocore; M A Whitt
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 1.993

View more
  1 in total

1.  Gene gun-mediated in vivo analysis of tissue-specific repression of gene transcription driven by the chicken ovalbumin promoter in the liver and oviduct of laying hens.

Authors:  T Muramatsu; T Imai; H M Park; H Watanabe; A Nakamura; J Okumura
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.396

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.