Literature DB >> 7793804

Management of small fragment wounds in war: current research.

G W Bowyer1, G J Cooper, P Rice.   

Abstract

The majority of war wounds are caused by antipersonnel fragments from munitions such as mortars and bomblets. Modern munitions aim to incapacitate soldiers with multiple wounds from very small fragments of low available kinetic energy. Many of these fragments may be stopped by helmets and body armour and this has led to a predominance of multiple wounds to limbs in those casualties requiring surgery. The development of an appropriate management strategy for these multiple wounds requires knowledge of the contamination and extent of soft tissue injury; conservative management may be appropriate. The extent of skin and muscle damage associated with a small fragment wound, the way in which these wounds may progress without intervention and their colonisation by bacteria has been determined in an experimental animal model. Results from 12 animals are presented. There was a very small (approximately 1 mm) margin of nonviable skin around the entrance wound. The amount of devitalised muscle in the wound tract was a few hundred milligrams. Some muscles peripheral to the wound track also showed signs of damage 1 h after wounding, but this improved over 24 h; the proportion of fragmented muscle fibres in the tissue around the track decreased as time went on. There was no clinical sign or bacteriological evidence of the track becoming infected up to 24 h after wounding. This preliminary work suggests that, in the absence of infection, the amount of muscle damage caused by small fragment wounds begins to resolve in the first 24 h after injury, even without surgical intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7793804      PMCID: PMC2502148     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  5 in total

1.  An evaluation of the surgeon's criteria for determining the viability of muscle during débridement.

Authors:  C P ARTZ; Y SAKO; R E SCULLY
Journal:  AMA Arch Surg       Date:  1956-12

2.  Penetrating missile injuries in the Gulf war 1991.

Authors:  T J Spalding; M P Stewart; D N Tulloch; K M Stephens
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 3.  Field surgery on a future conventional battlefield: strategy and wound management.

Authors:  J M Ryan; G J Cooper; I R Haywood; S M Milner
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 4.  Wound ballistics: contemporary and future research.

Authors:  J M Ryan; G J Cooper; R L Maynard
Journal:  J R Army Med Corps       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 1.285

5.  Low-velocity gunshot wounds to extremities.

Authors:  N A Marcus; W F Blair; J M Shuck; G E Omer
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1980-12
  5 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Management of small fragment wounds in modern warfare: a return to Hunterian principles?

Authors:  G W Bowyer
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Role 2 military hospitals: results of a new trauma care concept on 170 casualties.

Authors:  A Ünlü; R A Cetinkaya; T Ege; P Ozmen; V Hurmeric; M T Ozer; P Petrone
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 3.693

3.  Embedded fragments from U.S. military personnel--chemical analysis and potential health implications.

Authors:  José A Centeno; Duane A Rogers; Gijsbert B van der Voet; Elisa Fornero; Lingsu Zhang; Florabel G Mullick; Gail D Chapman; Ayodele O Olabisi; Dean J Wagner; Alexander Stojadinovic; Benjamin K Potter
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.