Literature DB >> 7793647

Clinical effects and maternal and fetal plasma concentrations of epidural ropivacaine versus bupivacaine for cesarean section.

S Datta1, W Camann, A Bader, L VanderBurgh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ropivacaine is a new amide local anesthetic structurally similar to bupivacaine and mepivacaine. Previous studies showed that ropivacaine has a similar clinical effect as bupivacaine with regard to sensory anesthesia and slightly less motor blockade than bupivacaine. Ropivacaine appears to be less cardiotoxic and arrhythmogenic than bupivacaine. The clinical and pharmacokinetic effects of 0.5% ropivacaine (5 mg/ml) versus 0.5% bupivacaine (5 mg/ml) when used epidurally for elective cesarean section were investigated.
METHODS: Using a randomized, double-blind study design, 60 ASA physical status 1 or 2 term parturients presenting for elective cesarean section received either 0.5% bupivacaine (150 mg) or 0.5% ropivacaine (150 mg) epidurally in appropriate fractionated doses over a 10-min period. Onset, duration, and regression of sensory and motor blockade were noted until complete resolution was observed. Quality of intraoperative anesthesia and abdominal wall muscle relaxation were noted. Maternal plasma concentrations of local anesthetic were determined before anesthetic administration and 5, 10, 20, 30, and 60 min and 2, 3, 6, 8, 12, and 24 h after drug injection in 20 subjects. Umbilical cord blood was obtained at time of delivery for acid-base values and determination of the free and total plasma concentration of local anesthetic. Neonates also were examined for neurobehavioral assessments by Scanlon's and Neurologic and Adaptive Capacity Scores at 2 and 24 h after delivery.
RESULTS: All patients received satisfactory anesthesia for operation. The onset, duration, and regression of sensory blockade were similar for both groups. Onset of degree 1 and 2 motor blockade was faster, and duration of degree 1 motor block was longer in the group receiving bupivacaine. Hemodynamic sequelae were similar between groups. All neonates had 5-min Apgar scores of 7 or greater and normal acid-base values and neurobehavioral assessments. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed that the Cmax was similar for both drugs (1.3 +/- 0.09 for ropivacaine and 1.1 +/- 0.09 micrograms/ml for bupivacaine). The T1/2 of the terminal decline in plasma concentration was shorter for ropivacaine versus bupivacaine (5.2 +/- 0.60 versus 10.9 +/- 1.08 h, respectively; P < 0.01). The free (i.e., unbound) concentrations of ropivacaine were approximately twice those of bupivacaine in both maternal and neonatal blood at the time of delivery. The ratio of umbilical vein to maternal vein concentration of unbound drug was 0.72 for ropivacaine and 0.69 for bupivacaine.
CONCLUSIONS: Ropivacaine, 0.5%, epidurally provided satisfactory and similar sensory anesthesia compared to 0.5% bupivacaine for elective cesarean section. The Cmax was similar for both drugs, although the terminal half-life of ropivacaine was significantly shorter, and the blood concentrations of free ropivacaine were significantly greater than that for bupivacaine. These values were less than concentrations shown to be toxic in animals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7793647     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199506000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  12 in total

Review 1.  [Anesthesia in the breast feeding period. Excretion of anesthetic agents and adjuvants into breast milk and potential pharmacological side-effects on the suckling infant].

Authors:  C Lang; G Geldner; H Wulf
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Placental transfer of bupivacaine enantiomers in normal pregnant women receiving epidural anesthesia for cesarean section.

Authors:  Luciana de Barros Duarte; Elaine Christine Dantas Móises; Ricardo Carvalho Cavalli; Vera Lúcia Lanchote; Geraldo Duarte; Sérgio Pereira da Cunha
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Effect of decreased fetal perfusion on placental clearance of volatile anesthetics in a dual perfused human placental cotyledon model.

Authors:  Ryusuke Ueki; Tsuneo Tatara; Nobutaka Kariya; Noriko Shimode; Munetaka Hirose; Chikara Tashiro
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Comparison of placental transfer of local anesthetics in perfusates with different pH values in a human cotyledon model.

Authors:  Ryusuke Ueki; Tsuneo Tatara; Nobutaka Kariya; Noriko Shimode; Chikara Tashiro
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 5.  [Anesthesia and analgesia in the lactation period. Criteria for drug selection].

Authors:  C A Nassen; C Schaefer; J Wirbelauer; A Hönig; P Kranke
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  Differential effects of short- and long-term bupivacaine treatment on α1-adrenoceptor-mediated contraction of isolated rat aorta rings and the reversal effect of lipid emulsion.

Authors:  Hao Guo; He-fei Zhang; Wen-qi Xu; Qian Du; Jing Zhao; Lei-ming Ren
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 7.  Pain management via local anesthetics and responsive hydrogels.

Authors:  Kyle R Bagshaw; Curt L Hanenbaum; Erica J Carbone; Kevin W H Lo; Cato T Laurencin; Joseph Walker; Lakshmi S Nair
Journal:  Ther Deliv       Date:  2015-02

Review 8.  Preliminary risk-benefit analysis of ropivacaine in labour and following surgery.

Authors:  I Cederholm
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 9.  Ropivacaine: an update of its use in regional anaesthesia.

Authors:  K J McClellan; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  No Difference in Early Analgesia Between Liposomal Bupivacaine Injection and Intrathecal Morphine After TKA.

Authors:  John W Barrington; Roger H Emerson; Scott T Lovald; Adolph V Lombardi; Keith R Berend
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.