Literature DB >> 7793434

Role of the family in recovery and major depression.

G I Keitner1, C E Ryan, I W Miller, R Kohn, D S Bishop, N B Epstein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Major depression is significantly influenced by the family environment of the depressed patient. In order to explore how family functioning relates to this illness, the authors examined changes in family functioning over a 1-year course of major depression.
METHOD: Subjective (Family Assessment Device) and objective (McMaster Clinical Rating Scale) assessments of family functioning were collected at hospitalization and 6 and 12 months after discharge for 45 inpatients diagnosed with major depression and their family members. Patterns of family functioning were examined by subjective and objective perspectives, initial levels of functioning, and reports of patients and other family members.
RESULTS: Approximately 50% of families with a depressed member perceived their own family functioning as unhealthy; clinicians rated 70% of the families as unhealthy. While family functioning improved significantly from hospitalization through 12 months after discharge, the improvement was not uniform across all areas of functioning. Further, patients with good family functioning at hospitalization generally maintained their healthy functioning and were more likely to recover by 12 months than patients with poor family functioning. Although steady improvement in family functioning characterized the subjective ratings, objective assessments of family functioning suggested initial improvement followed by a decline from month 6 to month 12.
CONCLUSIONS: Results show a clear association between family functioning and recovery from major depression. Different aspects of family life respond differently to the depressive illness; no one family dimension was uniquely related to outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7793434     DOI: 10.1176/ajp.152.7.1002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0002-953X            Impact factor:   18.112


  24 in total

1.  Outcomes of a randomized study of a peer-taught Family-to-Family Education Program for mental illness.

Authors:  Lisa B Dixon; Alicia Lucksted; Deborah R Medoff; Joyce Burland; Bette Stewart; Anthony F Lehman; Li Juan Fang; Vera Sturm; Clayton Brown; Aaron Murray-Swank
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.084

2.  The questionnaire of family functioning: a preliminary validation of a standardized instrument to evaluate psychoeducational family treatments.

Authors:  Rita Roncone; Monica Mazza; Donatella Ussorio; Rocco Pollice; Ian R H Falloon; Pierluigi Morosini; Massimo Casacchia
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2007-07-06

3.  A Spanish version of the Family Assessment Device.

Authors:  Sergio Barroilhet; Adrián Cano-Prous; Salvador Cervera-Enguix; Maria João Forjaz; Francisco Guillén-Grima
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 4.328

4.  An exploratory analysis of the impact of family functioning on treatment for depression in adolescents.

Authors:  Norah C Feeny; Susan G Silva; Mark A Reinecke; Steven McNulty; Robert L Findling; Paul Rohde; John F Curry; Golda S Ginsburg; Christopher J Kratochvil; Sanjeev M Pathak; Diane E May; Betsy D Kennard; Anne D Simons; Karen C Wells; Michele Robins; David Rosenberg; John S March
Journal:  J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol       Date:  2009-11

5.  Differential relationship between depression severity and patients' perceived family functioning in women versus in men.

Authors:  Jeniimarie Febres; Rita Rossi; Brandon A Gaudiano; Ivan W Miller
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.254

6.  Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of lithium in youths with severe mood dysregulation.

Authors:  Daniel P Dickstein; Kenneth E Towbin; Jan Willem Van Der Veen; Brendan A Rich; Melissa A Brotman; Lisa Knopf; Laura Onelio; Daniel S Pine; Ellen Leibenluft
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.576

Review 7.  Electroconvulsive therapy: Part II: a biopsychosocial perspective.

Authors:  Nancy A Payne; Joan Prudic
Journal:  J Psychiatr Pract       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.325

8.  Attachment and social adjustment: relationships to suicide attempt and major depressive episode in a prospective study.

Authors:  Michael F Grunebaum; Hanga C Galfalvy; Lindsey Y Mortenson; Ainsley K Burke; Maria A Oquendo; J John Mann
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 4.839

Review 9.  Systematic review of dyadic and family-oriented interventions for late-life depression.

Authors:  Sarah T Stahl; Juleen Rodakowski; Ester M Saghafi; Mijung Park; Charles F Reynolds; Mary Amanda Dew
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 3.485

10.  The influence of family adaptability and cohesion on anxiety and depression of terminally ill cancer patients.

Authors:  Young-Yoon Park; Young-Jin Jeong; Junyong Lee; Nayun Moon; Inho Bang; Hyunju Kim; Kyung-Sook Yun; Yong-I Kim; Tae-Hee Jeon
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.