OBJECTIVE: Major depression is significantly influenced by the family environment of the depressed patient. In order to explore how family functioning relates to this illness, the authors examined changes in family functioning over a 1-year course of major depression. METHOD: Subjective (Family Assessment Device) and objective (McMaster Clinical Rating Scale) assessments of family functioning were collected at hospitalization and 6 and 12 months after discharge for 45 inpatients diagnosed with major depression and their family members. Patterns of family functioning were examined by subjective and objective perspectives, initial levels of functioning, and reports of patients and other family members. RESULTS: Approximately 50% of families with a depressed member perceived their own family functioning as unhealthy; clinicians rated 70% of the families as unhealthy. While family functioning improved significantly from hospitalization through 12 months after discharge, the improvement was not uniform across all areas of functioning. Further, patients with good family functioning at hospitalization generally maintained their healthy functioning and were more likely to recover by 12 months than patients with poor family functioning. Although steady improvement in family functioning characterized the subjective ratings, objective assessments of family functioning suggested initial improvement followed by a decline from month 6 to month 12. CONCLUSIONS: Results show a clear association between family functioning and recovery from major depression. Different aspects of family life respond differently to the depressive illness; no one family dimension was uniquely related to outcome.
OBJECTIVE: Major depression is significantly influenced by the family environment of the depressedpatient. In order to explore how family functioning relates to this illness, the authors examined changes in family functioning over a 1-year course of major depression. METHOD: Subjective (Family Assessment Device) and objective (McMaster Clinical Rating Scale) assessments of family functioning were collected at hospitalization and 6 and 12 months after discharge for 45 inpatients diagnosed with major depression and their family members. Patterns of family functioning were examined by subjective and objective perspectives, initial levels of functioning, and reports of patients and other family members. RESULTS: Approximately 50% of families with a depressed member perceived their own family functioning as unhealthy; clinicians rated 70% of the families as unhealthy. While family functioning improved significantly from hospitalization through 12 months after discharge, the improvement was not uniform across all areas of functioning. Further, patients with good family functioning at hospitalization generally maintained their healthy functioning and were more likely to recover by 12 months than patients with poor family functioning. Although steady improvement in family functioning characterized the subjective ratings, objective assessments of family functioning suggested initial improvement followed by a decline from month 6 to month 12. CONCLUSIONS: Results show a clear association between family functioning and recovery from major depression. Different aspects of family life respond differently to the depressive illness; no one family dimension was uniquely related to outcome.
Authors: Lisa B Dixon; Alicia Lucksted; Deborah R Medoff; Joyce Burland; Bette Stewart; Anthony F Lehman; Li Juan Fang; Vera Sturm; Clayton Brown; Aaron Murray-Swank Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Rita Roncone; Monica Mazza; Donatella Ussorio; Rocco Pollice; Ian R H Falloon; Pierluigi Morosini; Massimo Casacchia Journal: Community Ment Health J Date: 2007-07-06
Authors: Norah C Feeny; Susan G Silva; Mark A Reinecke; Steven McNulty; Robert L Findling; Paul Rohde; John F Curry; Golda S Ginsburg; Christopher J Kratochvil; Sanjeev M Pathak; Diane E May; Betsy D Kennard; Anne D Simons; Karen C Wells; Michele Robins; David Rosenberg; John S March Journal: J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol Date: 2009-11
Authors: Daniel P Dickstein; Kenneth E Towbin; Jan Willem Van Der Veen; Brendan A Rich; Melissa A Brotman; Lisa Knopf; Laura Onelio; Daniel S Pine; Ellen Leibenluft Journal: J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 2.576
Authors: Michael F Grunebaum; Hanga C Galfalvy; Lindsey Y Mortenson; Ainsley K Burke; Maria A Oquendo; J John Mann Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2009-10-09 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Sarah T Stahl; Juleen Rodakowski; Ester M Saghafi; Mijung Park; Charles F Reynolds; Mary Amanda Dew Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2016-01-21 Impact factor: 3.485