Literature DB >> 7792624

Under-users of antenatal care: a comparison of non-attenders and late attenders for antenatal care, with early attenders.

A McCaw-Binns1, J La Grenade, D Ashley.   

Abstract

Demographic, behavioural, environmental, economic and obstetric history data from the Jamaican Perinatal Morbidity and Mortality Survey were examined to identify characteristics of women who do not attend for antenatal care, or present late instead of early for care, using multiple logistic regression. Non-attenders were more likely to be teenagers, unmarried, in unions of very short duration, smokers and women who felt that friends and relatives were not supportive. Multigravid non-attenders often had short inter-pregnancy intervals and included women who had experienced a post neonatal death. They were often drawn from deprived environments (lack of sanitation, water supplies). Late attenders shared features common to non-attenders (teenagers, unmarried, multigravid). Many however were self employed and did not fit the depressed profile of the non-attender. Most multigravidae who attended late had had previously uneventful pregnancies, including this one. Early attenders had little in common with non-attenders or late attenders. They were older, many had a secondary or tertiary education, were married and were generally middle class women. The group however included high risk multigravidae who had previous pregnancy complications or bad outcomes. Programmes aimed at reaching non-attenders must focus on the wider social and economic needs of these women and must give them a sense of their own power to effect change in their lives. Reaching the late attender will be more difficult and may be unnecessary with the possible exception of the teenager. She needs to be treated in a more sympathetic and non-judgmental way as this is often a high risk pregnancy. More fundamental changes require improved educational and employment opportunities for women as the best consumer is an educated consumer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7792624     DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)00175-s

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  32 in total

1.  Dimensions of women's autonomy and the influence on maternal health care utilization in a north Indian city.

Authors:  S S Bloom; D Wypij; M Das Gupta
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2001-02

2.  Concordance between partners in desired waiting time to birth for newlyweds in India.

Authors:  Abhishek Singh; Stan Becker
Journal:  J Biosoc Sci       Date:  2011-09-21

Review 3.  A systematic review of inequalities in the use of maternal health care in developing countries: examining the scale of the problem and the importance of context.

Authors:  Lale Say; Rosalind Raine
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 9.408

4.  The quality of family relationships and use of maternal health-care services in India.

Authors:  Keera Allendorf
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  2010-12

5.  Antenatal Care Among Poor Women in Mexico in the Context of Universal Health Coverage.

Authors:  Edson Servan-Mori; Veronika Wirtz; Leticia Avila-Burgos; Ileana Heredia-Pi
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-10

6.  The role of mothers-in-law in antenatal care decision-making in Nepal: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Bibha Simkhada; Maureen A Porter; Edwin R van Teijlingen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Predictors of HIV seropositivity following intrapartum voluntary counseling and testing among Rwandan women.

Authors:  H M Salihu; O N Nnedu; E Karita; J Vyankandindera; Pauline E Jolly
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.246

8.  Economic inequalities in maternal health care: prenatal care and skilled birth attendance in India, 1992-2006.

Authors:  Praveen Kumar Pathak; Abhishek Singh; S V Subramanian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Explaining ethnic differences in late antenatal care entry by predisposing, enabling and need factors in The Netherlands. The Generation R Study.

Authors:  A A Choté; G T Koopmans; W K Redekop; C J M de Groot; R J Hoefman; V W V Jaddoe; A Hofman; E A P Steegers; J P Mackenbach; M Trappenburg; M Foets
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2011-08

10.  Determinants of use of maternal health services in Nigeria--looking beyond individual and household factors.

Authors:  Stella Babalola; Adesegun Fatusi
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.