Literature DB >> 7791092

The effects of anorectic and aversive agents on deprivation-induced feeding and taste aversion conditioning in rats.

G N Ervin1, L S Birkemo, M F Johnson, L K Conger, J T Mosher, J A Menius.   

Abstract

We compared the effects of intraperitoneally administered LiCl (0.5-2830 mumol/kg), sulfated cholecystokinin26-33 (10-1000 nmol/kg; CCK-8), nonsulfated CCK-8 (500 and 1000 nmol/kg), sulfated CCK26-29 (500 and 1000 nmol/kg), CCK30-33 (10-1000 nmol/kg) bombesin (10-1000 nmol/kg; BOM), (dl) fenfluramine HCl (0.9-37.3 mumol/kg; fenfluramine), fluoxetine HCl (2.9-86.7 mumol/kg; fluoxetine), and d-amphetamine sulfate (0.27-10.9 mumol/kg; AMPH) on both 18-hr deprivation-induced feeding and one-bottle, taste aversion conditioning in male, Long-Evans rats. Doses of LiCl > or = 177 mumol/kg (or 7.5 mg/kg) induced significant, dose-related taste aversions, but only doses of LiCl > or = 2123 mumol/kg (90 and 120 mg/kg) induced significant anorexia. CCK-8 induced marked anorexia (at doses > or = 25-50 nmol/kg), but only relatively mild taste aversions which were only statistically significant at the highest dose (1000 nmol/kg). The anorectic effects of CCK-8 at 500 and 1000 nmol/kg, but not at lower doses, lasted at least 3 hr. Sulfated CCK26-29, CCK30-33 and nonsulfated CCK-8 induced neither anorexia nor taste aversion. BOM induced marked anorexia at all doses tested, but did not induce statistically significant taste aversions. The nonpeptidal anorectic compounds, fenfluramine, fluoxetine, and AMPH, induced both dose-related anorexia and taste aversion conditioning. We focus on several issues concerning the interpretation of taste aversion conditioning. Our results challenge any simple relationship between the ability of a compound to induce taste aversion and to decrease feeding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7791092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther        ISSN: 0022-3565            Impact factor:   4.030


  6 in total

1.  Synergistic interaction between leptin and cholecystokinin to reduce short-term food intake in lean mice.

Authors:  M D Barrachina; V Martínez; L Wang; J Y Wei; Y Taché
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-09-16       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Interoceptive "satiety" signals produced by leptin and CCK.

Authors:  Scott E Kanoski; Elwood K Walls; T L Davidson
Journal:  Peptides       Date:  2007-03-03       Impact factor: 3.750

3.  Palatable food avoidance and acceptance learning with different stressors in female rats.

Authors:  N-C Liang; M E Smith; T H Moran
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  PEGylated cholecystokinin is more potent in inducing anorexia than conditioned taste aversion in rats.

Authors:  I Verbaeys; F León-Tamariz; H Pottel; E Decuypere; Q Swennen; M Cokelaere
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2008-06-23       Impact factor: 8.739

5.  Impaired satiation and increased feeding behaviour in the triple-transgenic Alzheimer's disease mouse model.

Authors:  Adedolapo Adebakin; Jenna Bradley; Sarah Gümüsgöz; Elizabeth J Waters; Catherine B Lawrence
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Enteroendocrine cell types that drive food reward and aversion.

Authors:  Ling Bai; Nilla Sivakumar; Shenliang Yu; Sheyda Mesgarzadeh; Tom Ding; Truong Ly; Timothy V Corpuz; James C R Grove; Brooke C Jarvie; Zachary A Knight
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 8.713

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.