Literature DB >> 7790242

Late effects of hyperfractionated radiotherapy for advanced head and neck cancer: long-term follow-up results of RTOG 83-13.

K K Fu1, T F Pajak, V A Marcial, H G Ortiz, M Rotman, S O Asbell, L R Coia, N L Vora, R Byhardt, P Rubin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to examine the incidence of late effects of hyperfractionated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer as a function of the dose delivered, as well as the daily interfraction interval. In addition, we wished to examine the influence of other prognostic factors including age, gender, primary site, T- and N-stage, and overall stage on the late effects of hyperfractionated radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1983 and 1987, 479 patients with advanced head and neck cancer were entered on a Phase ILE/II dose escalation trial of hyperfractionated radiotherapy. They were randomly assigned to receive a dose of 67.2, 72.0, 76.8, or 81.6 Gy, delivered at 1.2 Gy/fraction, twice a day (BID), 5 days/week. Of the 451 analyzable patients, 399 patients who received > or = 64.8 Gy and had a follow-up > 90 days were eligible for this study. Acute and late effects were scored with the RTOG/EORTC late radiation morbidity scoring scheme. For this analysis, patients were subclassified by the actual doses delivered and by an average daily interfraction interval of < or = 4.5 h or > 4.5 h. The incidence of late effects was estimated using a cumulative incidence approach.
RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients received 67.2 +/- 2.4 Gy, 119 received 72.0 +/- 2.4 Gy, 98 received 76.8 +/- 2.4 Gy, and 123 received 81.6 +/- 2.4 Gy. The proportion of patients treated with a daily interfraction interval of > 4.5 h was 32, 50, 43, and 71%, respectively. The four treatment groups were well balanced with respect to pretreatment characteristics. The median follow-up was 1.71 years (range: 0.24-9.6) for all evaluable patients and 6.12 years for 85 alive patients. There was no significant difference in the incidence of late effects between the different dose levels. At 5 years, the cumulative incidence of late effects was 17, 14, 20, and 13% for grade 3, and 7, 3, 7, and 5% for grade 4. However, the incidence of late effects differed significantly with respect to daily interfraction interval. The cumulative incidence of grade 4 late effects increased from 6.3% at 2 years to 7.5% at 3 years to 8.0% at 4 years and 8.6% at 5 years with an interval of < or = 4.5 h, while it remained at a constant of 2.0% with an interval of > 4.5 h during the same period (p = 0.0036). Multivariate analysis showed that among the prognostic factors examined, daily interfraction interval of < or = 4.5 h was the only significant independent prognostic factor for the development of grade 3+ or grade 4 late effects (p = 0.0167 and p = 0.0013, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Results of this randomized Phase ILE/II trial of hyperfractionated radiotherapy in head and neck cancer showed no apparent dose-response relationship for late effects within the range of 67.2-81.6 Gy. Daily interfraction interval was a significant independent factor for the development of late effects in a multivariate analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7790242     DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(95)00080-I

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  7 in total

1.  Radiation plus Procarbazine, CCNU, and Vincristine in Low-Grade Glioma.

Authors:  Jan C Buckner; Edward G Shaw; Stephanie L Pugh; Arnab Chakravarti; Mark R Gilbert; Geoffrey R Barger; Stephen Coons; Peter Ricci; Dennis Bullard; Paul D Brown; Keith Stelzer; David Brachman; John H Suh; Christopher J Schultz; Jean-Paul Bahary; Barbara J Fisher; Harold Kim; Albert D Murtha; Erica H Bell; Minhee Won; Minesh P Mehta; Walter J Curran
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Final results of local-regional control and late toxicity of RTOG 9003: a randomized trial of altered fractionation radiation for locally advanced head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan J Beitler; Qiang Zhang; Karen K Fu; Andy Trotti; Sharon A Spencer; Christopher U Jones; Adam S Garden; George Shenouda; Jonathan Harris; Kian K Ang
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Long-term oral effects in patients treated with radiochemotherapy for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Aline Lima da Silva Deboni; Adelmo José Giordani; Nilza Nelly Fontana Lopes; Rodrigo Souza Dias; Roberto Araujo Segreto; Siri Beier Jensen; Helena Regina Comodo Segreto
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Retreatment in locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Current status and perspectives.

Authors:  Sharon Shuxian Poh; Yoke Lim Soong; Kiattisa Sommat; Chwee Ming Lim; Kam Weng Fong; Terence Wk Tan; Melvin Lk Chua; Fu Qiang Wang; Jing Hu; Joseph Ts Wee
Journal:  Cancer Commun (Lond)       Date:  2021-05-06

5.  Cancer Therapy: A Continuance of Health Burden.

Authors:  Sowmya Kasetty; Samar Khan; Sudheendra U Shridhar; Sandeep Gupta; Manisha Tijare; Shreenivas Kallianpur; T Raju Ragavendra
Journal:  World J Oncol       Date:  2012-10-28

6.  Radiobiological modeling of interplay between accelerated repopulation and altered fractionation schedules in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Loredana G Marcu; Eva Bezak
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2009-10

Review 7.  Modern Radiotherapy Concepts and the Impact of Radiation on Immune Activation.

Authors:  Lisa Deloch; Anja Derer; Josefin Hartmann; Benjamin Frey; Rainer Fietkau; Udo S Gaipl
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 6.244

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.