Literature DB >> 7789349

Negative affective consequences of thinking about disease detection behaviors.

M G Millar1, K Millar.   

Abstract

It was proposed that thinking about disease-detection behavior would lead to more negative moods than thinking about health-promotion behavior. Detection behaviors produce more negative moods because they can threaten perceptions of good health. In a laboratory study, the initial mood states of 121 participants recruited from undergraduates and the general community were measured using a neutral-words rating procedure. Then participants were randomly assigned to think about performing a disease-detection behavior or a health-promotion behavior. Subsequently, they wrote down their responses to the behavior and evaluated these as either positive, negative, or neutral. Finally, the participant's mood was remeasured using both a neutral words-rating procedure and a more traditional bipolar rating measure. Results indicated that thought about disease-detection behavior produced more negative affective responses and more negative mood change than did thought about health-promotion behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7789349     DOI: 10.1037//0278-6133.14.2.141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Psychol        ISSN: 0278-6133            Impact factor:   4.267


  8 in total

1.  The effects of perceived stress on reactions to messages designed to increase health behaviors.

Authors:  Murray Millar
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2005-10-13

2.  The effects of anxiety on response times to disease detection and health promotion behaviors.

Authors:  M G Millar; K Millar
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1996-08

3.  Selective Exposure to Health Information: The Role of Headline Features in the Choice of Health Newsletter Articles.

Authors:  Hyun Suk Kim; Heather Forquer; Joseph Rusko; Robert C Hornik; Joseph N Cappella
Journal:  Media Psychol       Date:  2016-01-12

4.  Survivor profiles predict health behavior intent: the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.

Authors:  Cheryl L Cox; Liang Zhu; Lorna Finnegan; Brenda D Steen; Melissa M Hudson; Leslie L Robison; Kevin C Oeffinger
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2011-03-06       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  Medical screening participation in the childhood cancer survivor study.

Authors:  Cheryl L Cox; Melissa M Hudson; Ann Mertens; Kevin Oeffinger; John Whitton; Michele Montgomery; Leslie L Robison
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-03-09

6.  Survivor typologies predict medical surveillance participation: the childhood cancer survivor study.

Authors:  Cheryl L Cox; Liang Zhu; Melissa M Hudson; Brenda D Steen; Leslie L Robison; Kevin C Oeffinger
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 7.  Integrating co-morbid depression and chronic physical disease management: identifying and resolving failures in self-regulation.

Authors:  Jerusha B Detweiler-Bedell; Michael A Friedman; Howard Leventhal; Ivan W Miller; Elaine A Leventhal
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-09-09

8.  Undetectable = Untransmittable (U = U) Messaging Increases Uptake of HIV Testing Among Men: Results from a Pilot Cluster Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Philip Smith; Alison Buttenheim; Laura Schmucker; Linda-Gail Bekker; Harsha Thirumurthy; Dvora L Joseph Davey
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2021-05-31
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.