Literature DB >> 7789188

Viability, development and incidence of chromosome anomalies of preimplantation embryos from XO mice.

M Banzai1, K Omoe, H Ishikawa, A Endo.   

Abstract

We examined the viability and developmental status of XO embryos at preimplantation stage (day 3 of gestation) by assessing blastocyst formation and counting cell number using our XO mouse colony. We also examined the incidence of chromosome anomalies. Embryos from XO mice (XY, XX and XO) developed more slowly (in cell numbers and blastocoele formation) than those from XX mice (XY and XX). XO embryos also tended to develop more slowly than XX embryos in the XO group. Although litter size at the preimplantation stage of gestation was almost twice as large (12.7) as those at mid-gestation (7.6) and near-term (7.2) in this colony, the adjusted XY:XX:XO ratio (2.8:2.0:1.0) did not differ greatly. This indicates that almost half of the embryos must have been eliminated during the first half of gestation in the XO group, probably regardless of sex chromosome complements. Thus, we consider that maternal XO sex chromosome constitution is disadvantageous for the intrauterine development of the embryo during the early period of gestation. This may be related to precocious aging of XO mice. Further, we confirmed that a high incidence of abnormal karyotypes occurs in embryos from our XO mouse colony.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7789188     DOI: 10.1159/000134050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet        ISSN: 0301-0171


  5 in total

Review 1.  The great escape.

Authors:  C M Disteche
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Premature ovarian insufficiency in the XO female mouse on the C57BL/6J genetic background.

Authors:  B Vaz; F El Mansouri; X Liu; T Taketo
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 4.025

3.  Reproductive outcomes after preimplantation genetic testing in mosaic Turner syndrome: a retrospective cohort study of 100 cycles.

Authors:  Jingnan Liao; Keli Luo; Dehua Cheng; Pingyuan Xie; Yueqiu Tan; Liang Hu; Guangxiu Lu; Fei Gong; Ge Lin
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  A primer on the use of mouse models for identifying direct sex chromosome effects that cause sex differences in non-gonadal tissues.

Authors:  Paul S Burgoyne; Arthur P Arnold
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 5.027

Review 5.  Sex Chromosome Effects on Male-Female Differences in Mammals.

Authors:  Daniel M Snell; James M A Turner
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 10.834

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.