Literature DB >> 7788917

Provocation of hypotension during head-up tilt testing in subjects with no history of syncope or presyncope.

A Natale1, M Akhtar, M Jazayeri, A Dhala, Z Blanck, S Deshpande, A Krebs, J S Sra.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Head-up tilt test is increasingly being used to evaluate patients with syncope. This study was designed to evaluate the specificity of head-up tilt testing using different tilt angles and isoproterenol infusion doses in normal volunteers with no prior history of syncope or presyncope. METHODS AND
RESULTS: One hundred fifty volunteers were randomized to two groups of 75 each. In group 1, subjects were further randomized to have head-up tilt testing at a 60, 70, or 80 degree angle at baseline followed by repeat tilt testing during a low-dose isoproterenol infusion that increased the heart rate by an average of 20%. In group 2, after having a baseline head-up tilt test at a 70 degree angle for a maximum of 20 minutes, subjects were randomized to have a repeat tilt table testing at a 70 degree angle during a low-dose, 3 micrograms/min, or 5 micrograms/min isoproterenol infusion. In group 1, syncope or presyncope along with hypotension developed in 2 subjects during the baseline test at 60 and 70 degrees of tilt and in 5 subjects during tilting at 80 degrees. The addition of low-dose isoproterenol reduced the specificity minimally from 92% to 88% at both 60 and 70 degrees of tilt but substantially to 60% at an 80 degrees angle. However, 6 of the 10 subjects with a positive test at an 80 degree angle had an abnormal response after 10 minutes of tilt testing. In group 2, using various isoproterenol doses with tilt table testing at a 70 degree angle, low-dose (mean infusion dose, 1.5 +/- 0.45 microgram/min), 3 micrograms/min, and 5 micrograms/min isoproterenol infusions elicited an abnormal response in 1 (4%), 5 (20%), and 14 (56%) of the subjects, respectively. Using multiple logistic regression analysis, head-up tilt testing at an 80 degree angle (P = .01) or during 3 micrograms/min (P = .02) and 5 micrograms/min isoproterenol infusion rates (P < .001) was the most significant predictor of an abnormal response.
CONCLUSIONS: Head-up tilt testing at a 60 or 70 degree angle with or without low-dose isoproterenol infusion provides an adequate specificity. Caution is needed, however, in interpreting the results if the head-up tilt test at 80 degrees is extended beyond 10 minutes or if high doses of isoproterenol are used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7788917     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.92.1.54

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  28 in total

1.  The Newcastle protocols for head-up tilt table testing in the diagnosis of vasovagal syncope, carotid sinus hypersensitivity, and related disorders.

Authors:  R A Kenny; D O'Shea; S W Parry
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Haemodynamic effects of increasing angle of head up tilt.

Authors:  A Zaidi; D Benitez; P A Gaydecki; A Vohra; A P Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  Orthostatic hypotension: managing a difficult problem.

Authors:  Pearl K Jones; Brett H Shaw; Satish R Raj
Journal:  Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2015-10-01

4.  [Commentary on the guidelines the diagnosis and the therapy of syncope--the European Society of Cardiology 2001 and the update 2004].

Authors:  K Seidl; A Schuchert; J Tebbenjohanns; W Hartung
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2005-09

5.  Combined electroencephalography and measurements of transcranial blood flow velocity during orthostatic testing--a new approach to assess syncope of unknown origin?

Authors:  S Ladwig; S Ries; O Henning; A Valikovics; M Daffertshofer; B Pohlmann-Eden
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.435

6.  Head-up tilt table test: how far and how long?

Authors:  R K Khurana; E M Nicholas
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.435

7.  2015 heart rhythm society expert consensus statement on the diagnosis and treatment of postural tachycardia syndrome, inappropriate sinus tachycardia, and vasovagal syncope.

Authors:  Robert S Sheldon; Blair P Grubb; Brian Olshansky; Win-Kuang Shen; Hugh Calkins; Michele Brignole; Satish R Raj; Andrew D Krahn; Carlos A Morillo; Julian M Stewart; Richard Sutton; Paola Sandroni; Karen J Friday; Denise Tessariol Hachul; Mitchell I Cohen; Dennis H Lau; Kenneth A Mayuga; Jeffrey P Moak; Roopinder K Sandhu; Khalil Kanjwal
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 6.343

Review 8.  The fainting patient: value of the head-upright tilt-table test in adult patients with orthostatic intolerance.

Authors:  M Lamarre-Cliche; J Cusson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-02-06       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Cardiovascular variables do not predict head-up tilt test outcome better than body composition.

Authors:  Jacques-Olivier Fortrat; Daniel Schang; Elisabeth Bellard; Jacques Victor; Georges Lefthériotis
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 4.435

10.  Effects of the α1-adrenoceptor agonist phenylephrine on SART stress-induced orthostatic hypotension in rats.

Authors:  Yoshinori Funakami; Eiji Itoh; Taeko Hata; Tetsuyuki Wada; Seiji Ichida
Journal:  Biopsychosoc Med       Date:  2010-10-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.