Literature DB >> 7787472

Effect of IgM-positive crossmatches on survival in heart transplant recipients.

S A Scheinin1, B Radovancević, P Kimball, J M Duncan, C T Van Buren, O H Frazier, R Kerman.   

Abstract

To determine whether an IgM-positive crossmatch adversely affects the results of heart transplantation, we conducted a retrospective study of 125 orthotopic heart transplant recipients. A direct donor-recipient crossmatch was performed retrospectively on sera from all patients by the standard National Institutes of Health (NIH) method and the antihuman globulin (AHG) procedure. The patients were then divided into 3 groups as follows. Group 1 comprised 110 patients with a negative NIH and AHG crossmatch (control group). Group 2 comprised 5 patients with a positive NIH crossmatch and a negative AHG crossmatch. Group 3 comprised 10 patients with positive NIH and AHG crossmatches. All positive crossmatches in group 3 patients converted to negative after treatment of sera with dithioerythritol, indicating that the initial result was due to IgM antibodies. All patients received standard immunosuppressive treatment. An IgM-positive crossmatch did not affect the number or severity of rejection episodes among the 3 groups, nor did it have an effect on the incidence of infection. Whereas coronary artery disease was detected by angiography in 16 of 110 patients (14.6%) in group 1 and in 1 of 10 patients (10%) in group 3 (P = NS), no patient in group 2 was affected. Actuarial survival at 1 and 2 years post-transplant was significantly better for patients with an IgM-positive crossmatch (group 2) (100% survival at 2 years) than for patients with a negative crossmatch (group 1) (73% at 1 year and 71% at 2 years, P < 0.05). Based on our study, the effect of an IgM-positive crossmatch on survival is difficult to interpret because of the small sample size. An IgM-positive crossmatch, however;did not appear to have a deleterious effect on survival. It may be that the IgM antibody has an immunoregulatory role. A larger series of patients with positive crossmatches and longer follow-up will be necessary to evaluate the importance of these results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7787472      PMCID: PMC325212     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J        ISSN: 0730-2347


  13 in total

1.  A working formulation for the standardization of nomenclature in the diagnosis of heart and lung rejection: Heart Rejection Study Group. The International Society for Heart Transplantation.

Authors:  M E Billingham; N R Cary; M E Hammond; J Kemnitz; C Marboe; H A McCallister; D C Snovar; G L Winters; A Zerbe
Journal:  J Heart Transplant       Date:  1990 Nov-Dec

2.  The role of crossmatching in organ transplantation.

Authors:  R H Kerman
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 5.534

3.  The effect of HLA lymphocytotoxic antibody status and crossmatch result on cardiac transplant survival.

Authors:  D McCloskey; H Festenstein; N Banner; R Hawes; J Holmes; A Khaghani; J Smith; M Yacoub
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 1.066

4.  Inverse relationship between human leukocyte antigen match and development of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  B Radovancevic; S Birovljev; J D Vega; J L Lonquist; M S Sweeney; J D Vasiljevic; C T Van Buren; R H Kerman; O H Frazier
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 1.066

5.  Conversion of IgG-mediated complement-dependent cytotoxicity by reducing reagents.

Authors:  J A McIntyre; H D Boldt; W P Faulk; H Halbrook
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 10.247

6.  Immunoglobulin class and specificity of antibodies causing positive T cell crossmatches. Relationship to renal transplant outcome.

Authors:  J R Chapman; C J Taylor; A Ting; P J Morris
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Influence of panel-reactive antibody and lymphocytotoxic crossmatch on survival after heart transplantation.

Authors:  J Lavee; R L Kormos; R J Duquesnoy; T R Zerbe; J M Armitage; M Vanek; R L Hardesty; B P Griffith
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 10.247

8.  Antigenic specificity of antibody reactive in the antiglobulin-augmented lymphocytotoxicity test.

Authors:  T C Fuller; D Phelan; H M Gebel; G E Rodey
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Enhancement of human kidney allografts by cold B-lymphocyte cytotoxins.

Authors:  Y Iwaki; P I Terasaki; M S Park; R Billing
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1978-06-10       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  AHG and DTE/AHG procedure identification of crossmatch-appropriate donor-recipient pairings that result in improved graft survival.

Authors:  R H Kerman; P M Kimball; C T Van Buren; R M Lewis; V DeVera; V Baghdahsarian; A Heydari; B D Kahan
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.939

View more
  2 in total

1.  Ventricular assist device elicits serum natural IgG that correlates with the development of primary graft dysfunction following heart transplantation.

Authors:  Sarah B See; Kevin J Clerkin; Peter J Kennel; Feifan Zhang; Matthew P Weber; Kortney J Rogers; Debanjana Chatterjee; Elena R Vasilescu; George Vlad; Yoshifumi Naka; Susan W Restaino; Maryjane A Farr; Veli K Topkara; Paolo C Colombo; Donna M Mancini; P Christian Schulze; Bruce Levin; Emmanuel Zorn
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 10.247

Review 2.  Management of allosensitized cardiac transplant candidates.

Authors:  Mauricio Velez; Maryl R Johnson
Journal:  Transplant Rev (Orlando)       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.943

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.