Literature DB >> 7787086

Smooth muscle myosin: a high force-generating molecular motor.

P VanBuren1, W H Guilford, G Kennedy, J Wu, D M Warshaw.   

Abstract

Smooth muscle generates as much force per cross sectional area of muscle as skeletal muscle with only one-fifth the myosin content. Although this apparent difference could be explained at the tissue or cellular level, it is possible that at the molecular level smooth muscle cross-bridges generate greater average force than skeletal muscle cross-bridges. To test this hypothesis, we used an in vitro motility assay (VanBuren et al., 1994) in which either chicken thiophosphorylated gizzard smooth or pectoralis skeletal muscle monomeric myosin is adhered to a nitrocellulose surface. A fluorescently labeled actin filament, attached to an ultracompliant (50-200 nm/pN) glass microneedle, is brought in contact with the myosin surface. Isometric force, being generated by myosin cross-bridges pulling on the attached actin filament, is calculated from the extent to which the calibrated microneedle is deflected. By measuring the density of myosin adhered to the surface, we estimated the number of myosin cross-bridges that are able to interact with a length of actin filament in contact with the myosin surface. In a direct comparison between smooth and skeletal muscle myosin, the average force per cross-bridge was 0.8 and 0.2 pN, respectively. Surprisingly, smooth muscle myosin generates approximately 4 times greater average force per cross-bridge head than skeletal muscle myosin. Because average isometric force is the product of the cross-bridge unitary force and duty cycle, we are presently using a laser optical trap in an attempt to measure unitary events from single myosin molecules. This approach should allow us to determine whether an increase in unitary force, duty cycle, or both contribute to smooth muscle myosin's enhanced force-generating capacity compared with skeletal muscle myosin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7787086      PMCID: PMC1281938     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  14 in total

1.  Mechanical transients of single toad stomach smooth muscle cells. Effects of lowering temperature and extracellular calcium.

Authors:  M Yamakawa; D E Harris; F S Fay; D M Warshaw
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 4.086

2.  Sub-piconewton force fluctuations of actomyosin in vitro.

Authors:  A Ishijima; T Doi; K Sakurada; T Yanagida
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-07-25       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Active and rigor muscle stiffness [proceedings].

Authors:  Y E Goldman; R M Simmons
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Force measurements by micromanipulation of a single actin filament by glass needles.

Authors:  A Kishino; T Yanagida
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-07-07       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Force-generating capacity and contractile protein content of arterial smooth muscle.

Authors:  R A Murphy; J T Herlihy; J Megerman
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 4.086

6.  Smooth, cardiac and skeletal muscle myosin force and motion generation assessed by cross-bridge mechanical interactions in vitro.

Authors:  D E Harris; S S Work; R K Wright; N R Alpert; D M Warshaw
Journal:  J Muscle Res Cell Motil       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 2.698

7.  Smooth and skeletal muscle myosin both exhibit low duty cycles at zero load in vitro.

Authors:  D E Harris; D M Warshaw
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1993-07-15       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Effects of MgATP, MgADP, and Pi on actin movement by smooth muscle myosin.

Authors:  D M Warshaw; J M Desrosiers; S S Work; K M Trybus
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1991-12-25       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Force: velocity relationship in single isolated toad stomach smooth muscle cells.

Authors:  D M Warshaw
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 4.086

10.  Light chain phosphorylation regulates the movement of smooth muscle myosin on actin filaments.

Authors:  J R Sellers; J A Spudich; M P Sheetz
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  8 in total

1.  Actin filament mechanics in the laser trap.

Authors:  D E Dupuis; W H Guilford; J Wu; D M Warshaw
Journal:  J Muscle Res Cell Motil       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 2.698

2.  Increased myocardial short-range forces in a rodent model of diabetes reflect elevated content of β myosin heavy chain.

Authors:  Charles S Chung; Mihail I Mitov; Leigh Ann Callahan; Kenneth S Campbell
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 4.013

3.  Calculation of a Gap restoration in the membrane skeleton of the red blood cell: possible role for myosin II in local repair.

Authors:  C Cibert; G Prulière; C Lacombe; C Deprette; R Cassoly
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Ca++-sensitizing mutations in troponin, P(i), and 2-deoxyATP alter the depressive effect of acidosis on regulated thin-filament velocity.

Authors:  Thomas J Longyear; Matthew A Turner; Jonathan P Davis; Joseph Lopez; Brandon Biesiadecki; Edward P Debold
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2014-03-20

5.  Affinity for MgADP and force of unbinding from actin of myosin purified from tonic and phasic smooth muscle.

Authors:  Renaud Léguillette; Nedjma B Zitouni; Karuthapillai Govindaraju; Laura M Fong; Anne-Marie Lauzon
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 4.249

6.  Structural changes in isometrically contracting insect flight muscle trapped following a mechanical perturbation.

Authors:  Shenping Wu; Jun Liu; Mary C Reedy; Robert J Perz-Edwards; Richard T Tregear; Hanspeter Winkler; Clara Franzini-Armstrong; Hiroyuki Sasaki; Carmen Lucaveche; Yale E Goldman; Michael K Reedy; Kenneth A Taylor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Recent insights into muscle fatigue at the cross-bridge level.

Authors:  Edward P Debold
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Direct measurement of cortical force generation and polarization in a living parasite.

Authors:  Rachel V Stadler; Lauren A White; Ke Hu; Brian P Helmke; William H Guilford
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 4.138

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.