OBJECTIVE: To discover the attitude of tutors to tutoring and describe how they apply the teaching programme during the period interns spend at the Health Centre. DESIGN: Crossover study. Stratified random sampling by Teaching Units. SETTING: Primary Care Centres with teaching accreditation. PARTICIPANTS: 258 tutors from the state-wide Teaching Programme. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Tutors' attitudes and the activities undertaken with the interns were studied by means of a self-filled questionnaire. The attitudes scale revealed a good attitude toward tutoring. Above all ability to motivate (73%) was required of the good tutor. Shared quotas was the commonest model of tutoring (85%). Clinical care was the activity the tutors developed best (70%), with the doctor-patient relationship in second place (46%). The majority discussed the Clinical History with their intern (75%). Few supervised the carrying out of procedures (36%). 68% of interns performed at least one piece of research, although tutors thought they should do more investigative work (41%). During the three intern years, the relationship was hardly ever maintained (13%). CONCLUSIONS: Tutors' attitude to tutoring is adequate. There is agreement with the basic features of the Programme, which is best developed in the area of care. The general model is that of a shared quota. Teaching must be improved in the non-care aspects, with specific training being made available to tutors.
OBJECTIVE: To discover the attitude of tutors to tutoring and describe how they apply the teaching programme during the period interns spend at the Health Centre. DESIGN: Crossover study. Stratified random sampling by Teaching Units. SETTING: Primary Care Centres with teaching accreditation. PARTICIPANTS: 258 tutors from the state-wide Teaching Programme. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Tutors' attitudes and the activities undertaken with the interns were studied by means of a self-filled questionnaire. The attitudes scale revealed a good attitude toward tutoring. Above all ability to motivate (73%) was required of the good tutor. Shared quotas was the commonest model of tutoring (85%). Clinical care was the activity the tutors developed best (70%), with the doctor-patient relationship in second place (46%). The majority discussed the Clinical History with their intern (75%). Few supervised the carrying out of procedures (36%). 68% of interns performed at least one piece of research, although tutors thought they should do more investigative work (41%). During the three intern years, the relationship was hardly ever maintained (13%). CONCLUSIONS: Tutors' attitude to tutoring is adequate. There is agreement with the basic features of the Programme, which is best developed in the area of care. The general model is that of a shared quota. Teaching must be improved in the non-care aspects, with specific training being made available to tutors.