Literature DB >> 7786648

Primary angioplasty is the most effective treatment for an acute myocardial infarction.

F Zijlstra1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1995        PMID： 7786648      PMCID： PMC483848          DOI： 10.1136/hrt.73.5.403-a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Heart J        ISSN： 0007-0769


× No keyword cloud information.
  13 in total

1.  Balloon angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Was it buried alive?

Authors:  B Meier
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Early myocardial revascularization during acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  F D Loop; C Cheanvechai; W C Sheldon; P C Taylor; D B Effler
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  Myocardial infarction: ACE inhibitors for all? For ever?

Authors:  M L Simoons
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-07-30       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Medical and surgical management of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  M A DeWood; J Spores; R N Notske; H T Lang; J P Shields; C S Simpson; L W Rudy; R Grunwald
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 5.  Thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. A review .

Authors:  C B Granger; R M Califf; E J Topol
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  A comparison of immediate coronary angioplasty with intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  F Zijlstra; M J de Boer; J C Hoorntje; S Reiffers; J H Reiber; H Suryapranata
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-03-11       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  A comparison of immediate angioplasty with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. The Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study Group.

Authors:  C L Grines; K F Browne; J Marco; D Rothbaum; G W Stone; J O'Keefe; P Overlie; B Donohue; N Chelliah; G C Timmis
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-03-11       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Immediate angioplasty compared with the administration of a thrombolytic agent followed by conservative treatment for myocardial infarction. The Mayo Coronary Care Unit and Catheterization Laboratory Groups.

Authors:  R J Gibbons; D R Holmes; G S Reeder; K R Bailey; M R Hopfenspirger; B J Gersh
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-03-11       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Limitation of infarct size and preservation of left ventricular function after primary coronary angioplasty compared with intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  M J de Boer; H Suryapranata; J C Hoorntje; S Reiffers; A L Liem; K Miedema; W T Hermens; M J van den Brand; F Zijlstra
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Primary coronary angioplasty versus intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction: differences in outcome during a mean follow-up of 18 months.

Authors:  F Zijlstra; M J de Boer; J P Ottervanger; A L Liem; J C Hoorntje; H Suryapranata
Journal:  Coron Artery Dis       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 1.439
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Treating myocardial infarction in the post-GUSTO era. A European perspective.

Authors:  M J de Boer; F Zijlstra
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Transferring patients for primary angioplasty: a retrospective analysis of 104 selected high risk patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  F Zijlstra; A W van 't Hof; A L Liem; J C Hoorntje; H Suryapranata; M J de Boer
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.994
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.