Literature DB >> 7786635

Predicting vertebral deformity using bone densitometry at various skeletal sites and calcaneus ultrasound.

P Ross1, C Huang, J Davis, K Imose, J Yates, J Vogel, R Wasnich.   

Abstract

We investigated the usefulness of bone density measurements from multiple skeletal sites and calcaneus ultrasound for evaluating the probability of vertebral deformation. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured at the second metacarpal and middle phalanges using radiographic absorptiometry of hand radiographs, and at the lumbar spine using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Distal radius and proximal radius were measured using single-energy x-ray absorptiometry (SXA), expressed as bone mineral content (BMC, grams per centimeter), and as BMD (grams per square centimeter). The calcaneus was measured using both SXA (BMD) and broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA). Among the women in this study (mean age 74, SD = 5), 84 women developed new vertebral deformations (57 cases with one and 27 cases with two or more deformations), which were identified on serial radiographs during an average of 9 years prior to the measurements of bone density. Logistic regression analysis was used to calculate odds ratios for risk of deformation corresponding to a 1-SD difference in density or ultrasound, adjusted for age. All bone measurements were significantly associated with vertebral deformation, with odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) ranging from 1.40 (1.10, 1.78) for proximal radius BMD to 1.88 (1.45, 2.44) for calcaneus BMD measurements. Measurements of calcaneal BUA, calcaneal BMD, and hand BMD generally remained significant when included simultaneously with another measurement in the same model, suggesting that spine or radius BMD may not provide much additional information about risk of deformation. It appears that all of the measurements of bone density and ultrasound provide useful information regarding the probability of deformation. These findings await confirmation in a prospective study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7786635     DOI: 10.1016/8756-3282(94)00045-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  20 in total

1.  Assessment of the tibia using ultrasonic guided waves in pubertal girls.

Authors:  P Moilanen; P H F Nicholson; T Kärkkäinen; Q Wang; J Timonen; S Cheng
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Bone mineral density-independent association of quantitative ultrasound measurements and fracture risk in women.

Authors:  Tuan V Nguyen; Jacqueline R Center; John A Eisman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-08-07       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Assessment of fracture risk.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Frederik Borgstrom; Chris De Laet; Helena Johansson; Olof Johnell; Bengt Jonsson; Anders Oden; Niklas Zethraeus; Bruce Pfleger; Nikolai Khaltaev
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Developing a policy on osteoporosis. Dual energy x ray absorptiometry may not be the gold standard.

Authors:  C R Paterson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-05-11

5.  Assessment of the relationship between broadband ultrasound attenuation and bone mineral density at the calcaneus using BUA imaging and DXA.

Authors:  C Chappard; P Laugier; B Fournier; C Roux; G Berger
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Radiographic absorptiometry for measuring bone mass.

Authors:  P D Ross
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Quantitative ultrasound for the assessment of bone status.

Authors:  R Morita; I Yamamoto; I Yuu; Y Hamanaka; T Ohta; M Takada; R Matsushita; K Masuda
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Volumetric bone mineral density using peripheral quantitative computed tomography in Japanese women.

Authors:  Y Hasegawa; K Kushida; K Yamazaki; T Inoue
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 9.  The epidemiology of quantitative ultrasound: a review of the relationships with bone mass, osteoporosis and fracture risk.

Authors:  E W Gregg; A M Kriska; L M Salamone; M M Roberts; S J Anderson; R E Ferrell; L H Kuller; J A Cauley
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  The effect of age, weight, and lifestyle factors on calcaneal quantitative ultrasound: the ESOPO study.

Authors:  Silvano Adami; Sandro Giannini; Ruben Giorgino; GianCarlo Isaia; Stefania Maggi; Luigi Sinigaglia; Paolo Filipponi; Gaetano Crepaldi; Ombretta Di Munno
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-04-11       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.