Literature DB >> 7786048

Chemical sensitivity attributed to pesticide exposure versus remodeling.

C S Miller1, H C Mitzel.   

Abstract

One hundred twelve individuals who reported onset of multiple chemical sensitivity following well-documented exposure to either (1) a cholinesterase-inhibiting organophosphate or carbamate pesticide or (2) remodeling of a building completed mail-out/mail-back questionnaires concerning their exposure, symptoms, sensitivity to ingestants and inhalants, utilization of health-care resources, and impact of their illness on lifestyle. It was hypothesized that if multiple chemical sensitivity resulted from neurotoxic exposure, then organophosphate-exposed respondents should report greater severity of illness resulting from the relatively greater neurotoxicity of this class of chemicals. Pesticide-exposed and remodeling-exposed multiple chemical sensitivity groups reported similar patterns of symptoms and identified similar inhalants and ingestants as triggers for their symptoms; these results suggested a common mechanism (biological and/or psychological) for their conditions. The pesticide-exposed group, however, reported significantly greater symptom severity than did the remodeling-exposed group, especially for neuromuscular, affective, airway, gastrointestinal, and cardiac symptoms. These findings provide evidence for (1) a possible biological basis for multiple chemical sensitivity and (2) a distinct pathophysiology or final common pathway for the condition that, while as yet undefined, appears to be shared by these two groups. Although subjective multisystem health complaints characterize both multiple chemical sensitivity and somatoform disorder, features of this multiple chemical sensitivity sample were inconsistent with somatoform disorder, i.e., onset after 30 y of age in 83%, the predominance of severe cognitive symptoms, and attributions of environmental causation. No group differences were found with respect to lifestyle impact. Eighty-one percent of respondents said they had been working full-time at the time they were exposed, yet at the time of the survey (on average, 7.7 y post exposure) only 12.5% were working full-time. The majority said they had quit their jobs, changed jobs, or changed careers because of their illness. Approximately 40% reported that they had consulted 10 or more medical practitioners. The persistent, disabling neuropsychological symptoms reported by these multiple chemical sensitivity groups are strikingly similar to those reported among individuals exposed occupationally to pesticides and solvents. These parallel findings suggest that the types and levels of exposures associated with extermination and remodeling may not be inconsequential, at least for a subset of the population. Further studies from a variety of perspectives, including human challenge studies and the development of animal models, are needed to define the pathophysiological and psychological mechanisms underlying this costly condition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7786048     DOI: 10.1080/00039896.1995.9940889

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Environ Health        ISSN: 0003-9896


  24 in total

1.  Chemical intolerance in primary care settings: prevalence, comorbidity, and outcomes.

Authors:  David A Katerndahl; Iris R Bell; Raymond F Palmer; Claudia S Miller
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 2.  The new tapestry of risk assessment.

Authors:  Bernard Weiss; Deborah Cory-Slechta; Steven G Gilbert; Donna Mergler; Elise Miller; Claudia Miller; M Christopher Newland; Deborah Rice; Ted Schettler
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2008-04-20       Impact factor: 4.294

3.  Evaluation of subjective symptoms of Japanese patients with multiple chemical sensitivity using QEESI(c).

Authors:  Sachiko Hojo; Kou Sakabe; Satoshi Ishikawa; Mikio Miyata; Hiroaki Kumano
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 3.674

4.  Multiple chemical sensitivity and idiopathic environmental intolerance (part one).

Authors:  Mitsuyasu Watanabe; Hideki Tonori; Yoshiharu Aizawa
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.674

Review 5.  Low-level chemical sensitivity: current perspectives.

Authors:  N A Ashford; C S Miller
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 6.  Multiple chemical sensitivity: a review of the theoretical and research literature.

Authors:  X S Labarge; R J McCaffrey
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 7.444

7.  Noise sensitivity and hyperacusis in patients affected by multiple chemical sensitivity.

Authors:  Andrea Viziano; Alessandro Micarelli; Marco Alessandrini
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2016-11-12       Impact factor: 3.015

8.  Multiple chemical sensitivity and idiopathic environmental intolerance (part two).

Authors:  Mitsuyasu Watanabe; Hideki Tonori; Yoshiharu Aizawa
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.674

Review 9.  Butyrylcholinesterase for protection from organophosphorus poisons: catalytic complexities and hysteretic behavior.

Authors:  Patrick Masson; Oksana Lockridge
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 4.013

Review 10.  A review of a two-phase population study of multiple chemical sensitivities.

Authors:  Stanley M Caress; Anne C Steinemann
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.