Literature DB >> 7785939

Stone analysis is not useful in the routine investigation of renal stone disease.

M J Henderson1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1995        PMID： 7785939     DOI： 10.1177/000456329503200201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem        ISSN： 0004-5632            Impact factor:   2.057


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Wet vs. dry chemical analysis of renal stones.

Authors:  I A Hashim; T H Zawawi
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1999 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Analysis of mixed stones is prone to error: a study with US laboratories using micro CT for verification of sample content.

Authors:  Amy E Krambeck; James E Lingeman; James A McAteer; James C Williams
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-10-22

Review 3.  ACP Best Practice No 181: Chemical pathology clinical investigation and management of nephrolithiasis.

Authors:  T M Reynolds
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Urinary stone composition in Oman: with high incidence of cystinuria.

Authors:  Mohammed S Al-Marhoon; Riad Bayoumi; Yahya Al-Farsi; Abdullhakeem Al-Hinai; Sultan Al-Maskary; Krishna Venkiteswaran; Qassim Al-Busaidi; Josephkunju Mathew; Khalid Rhman; Omar Sharif; Shahid Aquil; Intisar Al-Hashmi
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  FT-IR analysis of urinary stones: a helpful tool for clinician comparison with the chemical spot test.

Authors:  Aniello Primiano; Silvia Persichilli; Giovanni Gambaro; Pietro Manuel Ferraro; Alessandro D'Addessi; Andrea Cocci; Arcangelo Schiattarella; Cecilia Zuppi; Jacopo Gervasoni
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 3.434
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.