Literature DB >> 7784426

A model for the LexA repressor DNA complex.

R M Knegtel1, R H Fogh, G Ottleben, H Rüterjans, P Dumoulin, M Schnarr, R Boelens, R Kaptein.   

Abstract

A structural model for the interaction of the LexA repressor DNA binding domain (DBD) with operator DNA is derived by means of Monte Carlo docking. Protein-DNA complexes were generated by docking the LexA repressor DBD NMR solution structure onto both rigid and bent B-DNA structures while giving energy bonuses for contacts in agreement with experimental data. In the resulting complexes, helix III of the LexA repressor DBD is located in the major groove of the DNA and residues Asn-41, Glu-44, and Glu-45 form specific hydrogen bonds with bases of the CTGT DNA sequence. Ser-39, Ala-42, and Asn-41 are involved in a hydrophobic interaction with the methyl group of the first thymine base. Residues in the loop region connecting the two beta-sheet strands are involved in nonspecific contacts near the dyad axis of the operator. The contacts observed in the docked complexes cover the entire consensus CTGT half-site DNA operator, thus explaining the specificity of the LexA repressor for such sequences. In addition, a large number of nonspecific interactions between protein and DNA is observed. The agreement between the derived model for the LexA repressor DBD/DNA complex and experimental biochemical results is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7784426     DOI: 10.1002/prot.340210305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  12 in total

1.  LexA-DNA bond strength by single molecule force spectroscopy.

Authors:  F Kühner; L T Costa; P M Bisch; S Thalhammer; W M Heckl; H E Gaub
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Characterization of DinR, the Bacillus subtilis SOS repressor.

Authors:  K W Winterling; A S Levine; R E Yasbin; R Woodgate
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Dynamics of nucleosome invasion by DNA binding proteins.

Authors:  Hannah S Tims; Kaushik Gurunathan; Marcia Levitus; Jonathan Widom
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Structural constraints in collaborative competition of transcription factors against the nucleosome.

Authors:  Georgette Moyle-Heyrman; Hannah S Tims; Jonathan Widom
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Microfluidic chip-based long-term preservation and culture of engineering bacteria for DNA damage evaluation.

Authors:  Wenjia Wang; Yue Yu; Xiaoqiong Li; Jiandong Xu; Pei Ren; Yulin Deng; Xuefei Lv
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  LexA-binding sequences in Gram-positive and cyanobacteria are closely related.

Authors:  G Mazón; J M Lucena; S Campoy; A R Fernández de Henestrosa; P Candau; J Barbé
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2003-12-02       Impact factor: 3.291

7.  Structure of the LexA-DNA complex and implications for SOS box measurement.

Authors:  Adrianna P P Zhang; Ying Z Pigli; Phoebe A Rice
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Computational analysis of LexA regulons in Cyanobacteria.

Authors:  Shan Li; Minli Xu; Zhengchang Su
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Binding of the Bacillus subtilis LexA protein to the SOS operator.

Authors:  Eli S Groban; Martha B Johnson; Poopak Banky; Peta-Gaye G Burnett; Georgina L Calderon; Erica C Dwyer; Shakierah N Fuller; Biniam Gebre; Leah M King; Ila N Sheren; Lindi D Von Mutius; Thomas M O'Gara; Charles M Lovett
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-11-03       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  The Bacillus subtilis DinR binding site: redefinition of the consensus sequence.

Authors:  K W Winterling; D Chafin; J J Hayes; J Sun; A S Levine; R E Yasbin; R Woodgate
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.