Literature DB >> 7784281

High dependency units in the UK: variable size, variable character, few in number.

F J Thompson1, M Singer.   

Abstract

An exploratory descriptive survey was conducted to determine the size and character of high dependency units (HDUs) in the UK. A telephone survey and subsequent postal questionnaire was sent to the 39 general HDUs in the UK determined by a recent survey from the Royal College of Anaesthetists; replies were received from 28. Most HDUs (82%, n = 23) were geographically distinct from the intensive care unit and varied in size from three to 13 beds, although only 64% (n = 18) reported that all beds were currently open. Nurse: patient ratios were at least 1:3. Fifty per cent of units had one or more designated consultants in charge, although only 11% (n = 3) had specifically designated consultant sessions. Junior medical cover was provided mainly by the on-call speciality term. Twenty units acted as a step-down facility for discharged intensive care unit patients and 21 offered a step-up facility for patients from general wards. Provision of facilities and levels of monitoring varied between these units. Few HDUs exist in the UK and they are variable in size and in the facilities and monitoring procedures which they provide. Future studies are urgently required to determine cost-effectiveness and outcome benefit of this intermediate care facility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7784281      PMCID: PMC2398078          DOI: 10.1136/pgmj.71.834.217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Postgrad Med J        ISSN: 0032-5473            Impact factor:   2.401


  14 in total

1.  An evaluation of the costs and outcome of adult intensive care in two units in the UK.

Authors:  A M Shiell; R D Griffiths; A I Short; J Spiby
Journal:  Clin Intensive Care       Date:  1990

2.  Intermediate intensive care unit in New Jersey.

Authors:  R M Wargovich; C E Bekes; A Cernaianu
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system.

Authors:  W A Knaus; E A Draper; D P Wagner; J E Zimmerman
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  Outcomes in intensive care.

Authors:  J Bion
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-10-16

5.  Intensive Care Society's APACHE II study in Britain and Ireland--II: Outcome comparisons of intensive care units after adjustment for case mix by the American APACHE II method.

Authors:  K M Rowan; J H Kerr; E Major; K McPherson; A Short; M P Vessey
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-10-16

6.  The cost of intensive care: a comparison on one unit between 1988 and 1991.

Authors:  M Singer; S Myers; G Hall; S L Cohen; R F Armstrong
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System: update 1983.

Authors:  A R Keene; D J Cullen
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Variations in mortality and length of stay in intensive care units.

Authors:  W A Knaus; D P Wagner; J E Zimmerman; E A Draper
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-05-15       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Analysis of indications for early discharge from the intensive care unit. Clinical efficacy assessment project: American College of Physicians.

Authors:  R C Bone; N E McElwee; D H Eubanks; E H Gluck
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Patterns of resource consumption in medical intensive care.

Authors:  R K Oye; P E Bellamy
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 9.410

View more
  3 in total

1.  Does the introduction of HDU reduce surgical mortality?

Authors:  J Davies; R Tamhane; C Scholefield; P Curley
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  The impact of the establishment of a surgical high dependency unit on management of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  M Cleary; R A Cahill; F Younis; S J Sheehan; D Mehigan; M C Barry
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2006 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Effect of intermediate care on mortality following emergency abdominal surgery. The InCare trial: study protocol, rationale and feasibility of a randomised multicentre trial.

Authors:  Morten Vester-Andersen; Tina Waldau; Jørn Wetterslev; Morten Hylander Møller; Jacob Rosenberg; Lars Nannestad Jørgensen; Inger Gillesberg; Henrik Loft Jakobsen; Egon Godthåb Hansen; Lone Musaeus Poulsen; Jan Skovdal; Ellen Kristine Søgaard; Morten Bestle; Jesper Vilandt; Iben Rosenberg; Rasmus Ehrenfried Berthelsen; Jens Pedersen; Mogens Rørbæk Madsen; Thomas Feurstein; Malene Just Busse; Johnny D H Andersen; Christian Maschmann; Morten Rasmussen; Christian Jessen; Lasse Bugge; Helle Ørding; Ann Merete Møller
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-02-02       Impact factor: 2.279

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.