Literature DB >> 7782636

Combined use of bone grafts and implants in the severely resorbed maxilla. Postoperative evaluation by computed tomography.

E Nyström1, P E Legrell, A Forssell, K E Kahnberg.   

Abstract

Combined horseshoe-shaped iliac bone grafts and Brånemark fixtures were used to rehabilitate patients with severely resorbed maxillae. Twenty patients were followed-up by computed tomography (CT) examination with axial slices to assess the fixture sites and to study the changes in height and width of the bone graft 3 weeks and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. The mean height of the bone graft at the 3-week postoperative examination was 8.2 mm; after 2 years the mean value had decreased to 6.2 mm. The height reduction occurred mainly between the 3-month and 1-year examinations. The mean width of the bone graft at the 3-week postoperative examination was 12.2 mm, and it decreased to 8.6 mm after 2 years. Most of the width reduction took place during postoperative months 1-3. From 1 year after the grafting procedure, the rate of reduction of both height and width was very low.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7782636     DOI: 10.1016/s0901-5027(05)80851-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  9 in total

1.  [Combined sinus lift procedure and lateral augmentation. A treatment concept for the surgical and prosthodontic rehabilitation of the extremely atrophic maxilla].

Authors:  D Weingart; R Bublitz; G Petrin; J Kälber; S Ingimarsson
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2005-09

2.  Effect of amount of biomaterial used for maxillary sinus lift on volume maintenance of grafts.

Authors:  Luciene-Dornas Mendes; Roberta-Paula-Colen Bustamante; Bruno-César-Ladeira Vidigal; Mario-Nazareno Favato; Flávio-Ricardo Manzi; Mauricio-Greco Cosso; Elton-Gonçalves Zenóbio
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-09-01

3.  A review of implant provision for hypodontia patients within a Scottish referral centre.

Authors:  B Burns; V Grieg; V Bissell; L Savarrio
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  The Efficacy of the Graft Materials after Sinus Elevation: Retrospective Comparative Study Using Panoramic Radiography.

Authors:  Tae Min Jeong; Jeong Keun Lee
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2014-07-30

Review 5.  The Use of Tooth Derived Bone Graft Materials in Sinus Augmentation Procedures: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Eliyahu Shavit; Ilana Shavit; Daniel Pinchasov; David Shavit; Ginnady Pinchasov; Gintaras Juodzbalys
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2019-06-30

6.  Resorption of retromolar bone grafts after alveolar ridge augmentation-volumetric changes after 12 months assessed by CBCT analysis.

Authors:  Andres Stricker; Reinhilde Jacobs; Frederik Maes; Tabea Fluegge; Kirstin Vach; Jonathan Fleiner
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-01-21

7.  Platelet Rich Fibrin (P.R.F.) in reconstructive surgery of atrophied maxillary bones: clinical and histological evaluations.

Authors:  Marco Tatullo; Massimo Marrelli; Michele Cassetta; Andrea Pacifici; Luigi Vito Stefanelli; Salvatore Scacco; Gianna Dipalma; Luciano Pacifici; Francesco Inchingolo
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Volumetric stability of autogenous bone graft with mandibular body bone: cone-beam computed tomography and three-dimensional reconstruction analysis.

Authors:  Hyeong-Geun Lee; Yong-Deok Kim
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-10-20

9.  Comparison between Micro-Computed Tomography and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in the Assessment of Bone Quality and a Long-Term Volumetric Study of the Augmented Sinus Grafted with an Albumin Impregnated Allograft.

Authors:  Márton Kivovics; Bence Tamás Szabó; Orsolya Németh; Dóra Iványi; Bálint Trimmel; Ilona Szmirnova; Kaan Orhan; Eitan Mijiritsky; György Szabó; Csaba Dobó-Nagy
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 4.241

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.