Literature DB >> 7782111

Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of roxithromycin versus amoxycillin/clavulanic acid in a community-acquired lower respiratory tract infection study.

W G Scott, B C Cooper, H M Scott.   

Abstract

A cost-effectiveness study of roxithromycin versus amoxycillin/clavulanic acid using data from a 242 patient multicentre trial in Australia and New Zealand was undertaken in the general practice treatment of infections of the lower respiratory tract (LRTI). Those patients assigned to roxithromycin required on average 1 day less of treatment, significantly fewer extended courses of treatment, and fewer patients experienced side effects considered to be related to the treatment. The cost benefit (difference between the two treatment costs) per clinical success was A$17.04*. By substituting roxithromycin for amoxycillin/clavulanic acid, Australia would save A$ 1.704 million per 100,000 episodes of LRTI. The results demonstrate that savings in direct costs can be achieved by substituting roxithromycin for amoxycillin/clavulanic acid in the treatment of community-acquired LRTI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7782111     DOI: 10.1007/bf02464955

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infection        ISSN: 0300-8126            Impact factor:   3.553


  4 in total

1.  Roxithromycin versus cefaclor in lower respiratory tract infection: a general practice pharmacoeconomic study.

Authors:  W G Scott; M W Tilyard; S M Dovey; B Cooper; H M Scott
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. An update of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use.

Authors:  P A Todd; P Benfield
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Roxithromycin 150 mg b.i.d. versus amoxycillin 500 mg/clavulanic acid 125 mg t.i.d. for the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections in general practice.

Authors:  N C Karalus; J E Garrett; S D Lang; R A Leng; G N Kostalas; R T Cursons; B C Cooper; C J Ryan
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 4.  Roxithromycin. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and clinical efficacy.

Authors:  R A Young; J P Gonzalez; E M Sorkin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 9.546

  4 in total
  5 in total

1.  Modification of general practitioner prescribing of antibiotics by use of a therapeutics adviser (academic detailer).

Authors:  K F Ilett; S Johnson; G Greenhill; L Mullen; J Brockis; C L Golledge; D B Reid
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Economic evaluation of antibacterials in the treatment of acute sinusitis.

Authors:  C Laurier; J Lachaine; M Ducharme
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Review of macrolides and ketolides: focus on respiratory tract infections.

Authors:  G G Zhanel; M Dueck; D J Hoban; L M Vercaigne; J M Embil; A S Gin; J A Karlowsky
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Roxithromycin 150 mg b.i.d. versus amoxycillin 500 mg/clavulanic acid 125 mg t.i.d. for the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections in general practice.

Authors:  N C Karalus; J E Garrett; S D Lang; R A Leng; G N Kostalas; R T Cursons; B C Cooper; C J Ryan
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.553

5.  Cost-effectiveness of a structured medication review approach for multimorbid older adults: Within-trial analysis of the OPERAM study.

Authors:  Paola Salari; Cian O'Mahony; Séverine Henrard; Paco Welsing; Arjun Bhadhuri; Nadine Schur; Marie Roumet; Shanthi Beglinger; Thomas Beck; Katharina Tabea Jungo; Stephen Byrne; Stefanie Hossmann; Wilma Knol; Denis O'Mahony; Anne Spinewine; Nicolas Rodondi; Matthias Schwenkglenks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.