Literature DB >> 7781453

Velocity of peristaltic propagation in distal esophageal segments.

R E Clouse1, J L Hallett.   

Abstract

Recent studies of the peristaltic pressure wave have suggested the presence of two sequential but overlapping contraction segments in the distal esophageal body. In this report, propagation velocity of esophageal peristalsis was determined in these segments in normal subjects (N = 35) and in patients with high-amplitude peristalsis (nutcracker esophagus, N = 25) to see if intersegment differences were present in the normal or abnormal setting. Velocity measurements were made from conventional manometric tracings in two 4-cm regions representing the distal smooth-muscle segments. A novel method of velocity measurement was employed that used regression lines established from contraction onset times. In normal subjects, propagation velocity decreased significantly from the proximal to distal segment (4.9 +/- 0.5 cm/sec, vs 3.2 +/- 0.2 cm/sec, P < 0.01). Velocity also decreased across segments in nutcracker-esophagus patients (5.3 +/- 0.6 cm/sec, vs 3.6 +/- 0.7 cm/sec, P = 0.06), but the difference reached statistical significance only when the subset with highest amplitudes (> or = 180 mm Hg) was analyzed separately. Greater variance in velocity in the distal smooth-muscle segment of nutcracker-esophagus patients (P < 0.01) was, in part, responsible for this statistical observation. We conclude that normal propagation velocity decreases across regions corresponding to the smooth-muscle contraction segments defined by recent studies of peristalsis, supporting the assumption that they represent separate neuromuscular units. The mechanisms responsible for contraction wave abnormalities in the nutcracker esophagus have a minimal effect on propagation velocity, an effect that is restricted to the distal smooth-muscle segment of the esophageal body.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7781453     DOI: 10.1007/bf02065544

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  23 in total

1.  Effects of cholinergic stimulation on human esophageal peristalsis.

Authors:  J B Hollis; D O Castell
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 3.531

2.  Manometric patterns using esophageal body and lower sphincter characteristics. Findings in 1013 patients.

Authors:  R E Clouse; A Staiano
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Manometry and radiology. Complementary studies in the assessment of esophageal motility disorders.

Authors:  E G Hewson; D J Ott; C B Dalton; Y M Chen; W C Wu; J E Richter
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Pressure profile of esophageal peristalsis in normal humans as measured by direct intraesophageal transducers.

Authors:  T J Humphries; D O Castell
Journal:  Am J Dig Dis       Date:  1977-07

5.  Influence of metenkephalin analogue on motor activity of the gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  R Jians; J Janssens; G Vantrappen; P Ceccatelli
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Nutcracker esophagus: an idea whose time has gone?

Authors:  P J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Mechanisms affecting lower oesophageal sphincter opening and oesophageal retention. A combined X-ray and manometry study.

Authors:  P Ask; H Sökjer; L Tibbling
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 2.423

8.  The effect of pirenzepine on esophageal motility.

Authors:  E Erckenbrecht; W Berges; A Sonnenberg; J Erckenbrecht; M Wienbeck
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl       Date:  1982

9.  A study of esophageal pressures in normal persons and patients with cardiospasm.

Authors:  J W BUTIN; A M OLSEN; H J MOERSCH; C F CODE
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1953-02       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Esophageal testing of patients with noncardiac chest pain or dysphagia. Results of three years' experience with 1161 patients.

Authors:  P O Katz; C B Dalton; J E Richter; W C Wu; D O Castell
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  1 in total

1.  Characteristics of the propagating pressure wave in the esophagus.

Authors:  R E Clouse; A Staiano; S J Bickston; S M Cohn
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.199

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.