Literature DB >> 7778751

A survey of personal and professional attitudes of intensivists to organ donation and transplantation.

I Y Pearson1, Y Zurynski.   

Abstract

A questionnaire survey was carried out to examine the attitudes and practices of Australian and New Zealand intensivists with regard to brain death and organ donation. A return rate of 82.5% was achieved. Fifty-eight per cent had written evidence of their own wishes to donate organs and 94% would agree to donation from a dependent. At least one intensivist is involved in certifying brain death on 95% of occasions. Intensivists are involved in the request for organ donation over 90% of the time although one-third do not believe that it is their role to request organ donation. Although two-thirds believe that the family should always be approached for organ donation, another 52 out of 254 indicated that it was their (the intensivist's) role to decide if families should be asked for organ donation. Possible reasons for not requesting are language or other communication problems, perceptions of cultural differences and degrees of family distress. Twenty per cent of respondents do not provide haemodynamic support before brain death confirmation. Australian and New Zealand intensivists overwhelmingly support the concept of brain death, current methods of confirmation of brain death, organ donation and transplantation. Possible reasons behind loss of potential donors include decisions not to resuscitate both before and after brain death is confirmed. Perceptions of family grief and cultural differences clearly inhibit requests for organ donation. A very few units have an effective policy on approaching families about organ donation. Intensivists have almost exclusive control over requests for organ donation and thus bear a full professional responsibility for this element of hospital practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7778751     DOI: 10.1177/0310057X9502300113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care        ISSN: 0310-057X            Impact factor:   1.669


  7 in total

1.  Completion of advanced care directives is associated with willingness to donate.

Authors:  J Daryl Thornton; J Randall Curtis; Margaret D Allen
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.798

2.  Neurointensivists' opinions about death by neurological criteria and organ donation.

Authors:  Adrienne R Boissy; J Javier Provencio; Cheryl A Smith; Michael N Diringer
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.210

3.  Assessment of resident and fellow knowledge of the organ donor referral process.

Authors:  Natasha Gupta; Jacqueline M Garonzik-Wang; Ralph J Passarella; Megan L Salter; Lauren M Kucirka; Babak J Orandi; Andrew H Law; Dorry L Segev
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 2.863

4.  Identifying the potential organ donor: an audit of hospital deaths.

Authors:  Helen Ingrid Opdam; William Silvester
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-03-13       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Attitude of healthcare professionals: a major limiting factor in organ donation from brain-dead donors.

Authors:  Maciej Kosieradzki; Anna Jakubowska-Winecka; Michal Feliksiak; Ilona Kawalec; Ewa Zawilinska; Roman Danielewicz; Jaroslaw Czerwinski; Piotr Malkowski; Wojciech Rowiński
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2014-09-30

6.  COMmunication with Families regarding ORgan and Tissue donation after death in intensive care (COMFORT): protocol for an intervention study.

Authors:  Julie E Potter; Robert G Herkes; Lin Perry; Rosalind M Elliott; Anders Aneman; Jorge L Brieva; Elena Cavazzoni; Andrew T H Cheng; Michael J O'Leary; Ian M Seppelt; Val Gebski
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 7.  Clinical review: moral assumptions and the process of organ donation in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Stephen Streat
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2004-05-21       Impact factor: 9.097

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.