Literature DB >> 7777794

Quality of Life assessments in the evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux and peptic ulcer disease before, during and after treatment.

H Glise1, B Hallerbäck, B Johansson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It has recently been suggested that Quality of Life (QOL) be used in the evaluation of new medical treatment regimens together with cost-benefit, efficacy and safety. In this overview we point out some aspects of use of the Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWB) in patients with peptic ulcer and reflux disease gained from our own investigations in later years.
METHODS: QOL was assessed using questionnaires before diagnosis, during medical healing treatment and at a 1-year follow-up in peptic ulcer disease or before and after surgery in reflux disease.
RESULTS: Untreated patients with unknown diagnosis had low QOL scores. With treatment, scores increased rapidly to supernormal values and fell off to normal values during the follow-up year.
CONCLUSION: QOL evaluations seem sensitive and reflect the patient's subjective feeling of disease. They add another new aspect of treatment effect not earlier included in treatment evaluations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7777794     DOI: 10.3109/00365529509107775

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl        ISSN: 0085-5928


  11 in total

1.  An evidence-based appraisal of reflux disease management--the Genval Workshop Report.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  Acid suppression in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: Why? How? How much and when?

Authors:  M P Jones
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  Using GI-specific patient outcome measures in renal transplant patients: validation of the GSRS and GIQLI.

Authors:  Leah Kleinman; Anne Kilburg; Gerardo Machnicki; Randall Faull; Rowan Walker; Ramesh Prasad; Patrice Ambuehl; Udo Bahner; Mary Kay Margolis
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Reliability and validity of the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  D A Revicki; M Wood; I Wiklund; J Crawley
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Initial poor quality of life and new onset of dyspepsia: results from a longitudinal 10-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Alexander C Ford; David Forman; Alastair G Bailey; Anthony T R Axon; Paul Moayyedi
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Improvement in quality of life measures after laparoscopic antireflux surgery.

Authors:  T L Trus; W S Laycock; J P Waring; G D Branum; J G Hunter
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  Symptom and health-related quality-of-life measures for use in selected gastrointestinal disease studies: a review and synthesis of the literature.

Authors:  A M Rentz; C Battista; E Trudeau; R Jones; P Robinson; S Sloan; S Mathur; L Frank; D A Revicki
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Quality of life in functional dyspepsia.

Authors:  Joan Monés; Ana Adan; José L Segú; Juan S López; Maite Artés; Tina Guerrero
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  The societal gain of medical development and innovation in gastroenterology.

Authors:  Caroline M den Hoed; Kees Isendoorn; Wouter Klinkhamer; Anshu Gupta; Ernst J Kuipers
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.623

10.  Health-related quality of life improves with treatment-related GERD symptom resolution after adjusting for baseline severity.

Authors:  Dennis A Revicki; Marc W Zodet; Sandra Joshua-Gotlib; Douglas Levine; Joseph A Crawley
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2003-11-29       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.