J M Wild1, C Hudson. 1. Department of Vision Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the influence of macular pigment absorption on blue-on-yellow perimetry using a technique suitable for application with the Humphrey Field Analyzer. METHODS: The sample comprised one eye from each of 46 healthy subjects (age range, 20-80 years). Macular pigment absorption was assessed by measuring medium-wavelength sensitive cone sensitivity for 460- and 570-nm narrowband stimuli at the fovea, at 5.5 degrees and at 8 degrees eccentricity. The differences in sensitivities recorded between the fovea and 8 degrees eccentricity and between 5.5 degrees and 8 degrees eccentricity for the 460-nm stimulus relative to a value of zero at 570 nm were attributed to absorption by the macular pigment. Blue-on-yellow perimetry was undertaken using a 460-nm narrowband blue Goldmann size V stimulus and a yellow 330-cdm-2 background. RESULTS: Group macular pigment absorption (mean +/- standard error) was 0.40 +/- 0.03 log units foveally and 0.00 +/- 0.03 log units at 5.5 degrees eccentricity. The group mean foveal macular pigment absorption was significantly different from zero (P < 0.01). The coefficient of repeatability for the macular pigment absorption procedure (based on test-retest data for 16 subjects) was +/- 0.28 log units at the fovea and +/- 0.35 log units at 5.5 degrees eccentricity. CONCLUSION: The net effect of ocular media and macular pigment absorption relative to 460 nm was to attenuate the blue-on-yellow visual field at the fovea by approximately 0.80 log units and elsewhere by 0.40 log units.
PURPOSE: To determine the influence of macular pigment absorption on blue-on-yellow perimetry using a technique suitable for application with the Humphrey Field Analyzer. METHODS: The sample comprised one eye from each of 46 healthy subjects (age range, 20-80 years). Macular pigment absorption was assessed by measuring medium-wavelength sensitive cone sensitivity for 460- and 570-nm narrowband stimuli at the fovea, at 5.5 degrees and at 8 degrees eccentricity. The differences in sensitivities recorded between the fovea and 8 degrees eccentricity and between 5.5 degrees and 8 degrees eccentricity for the 460-nm stimulus relative to a value of zero at 570 nm were attributed to absorption by the macular pigment. Blue-on-yellow perimetry was undertaken using a 460-nm narrowband blue Goldmann size V stimulus and a yellow 330-cdm-2 background. RESULTS: Group macular pigment absorption (mean +/- standard error) was 0.40 +/- 0.03 log units foveally and 0.00 +/- 0.03 log units at 5.5 degrees eccentricity. The group mean foveal macular pigment absorption was significantly different from zero (P < 0.01). The coefficient of repeatability for the macular pigment absorption procedure (based on test-retest data for 16 subjects) was +/- 0.28 log units at the fovea and +/- 0.35 log units at 5.5 degrees eccentricity. CONCLUSION: The net effect of ocular media and macular pigment absorption relative to 460 nm was to attenuate the blue-on-yellow visual field at the fovea by approximately 0.80 log units and elsewhere by 0.40 log units.