Literature DB >> 7775711

Time to thrombolytic treatment: factors affecting delay and their influence on outcome.

W D Weaver1.   

Abstract

One of the major limitations to realizing the full potential of the lifesaving effects of thrombolytic therapy has been the failure to initiate treatment in the first 1 to 1.5 h after symptom onset. The barriers to early treatment include the following: 1) Most patients fail to react rapidly and appropriately to symptoms. 2) Few emergency medical/paramedic systems have established effective triage systems for patients with chest pain or have implemented prehospital electrocardiography to better manage patients with possible acute myocardial infarction. 3) Time to treatment after hospital arrival currently averages 1 to 1.5 h-two to three times longer than what should be necessary to initiate therapy in the patient with typical electrocardiographic and clinical findings and co-morbid risk factors. Trials evaluating the effects of prehospital-initiated therapy have all shown trends toward a reduction in mortality (18%) associated with early treatment; however, none has been large enough in and of itself to be conclusive. The goal in the coming years will be to decrease each of these components of delay by developing effective education programs for the lay public, speeding and improving prehospital care by the routine use of electrocardiography and reducing hospital treatment times to < or = 30 min in the "uncomplicated" patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7775711     DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00108-g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  22 in total

Review 1.  Why do delays in treatment occur? Lessons learned from ruptured appendicitis.

Authors:  N A Bickell; A L Siu
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  New thrombolytic strategy: bolus administration of tPA and urokinase-fibrinogen conjugate.

Authors:  A V Maksimenko; E G Tischenko
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Thrombolytic Therapy: The Treatment of Choice in Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Does the Manchester triage system detect the critically ill?

Authors:  M W Cooke; S Jinks
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1999-05

5.  Benefits of late reperfusion in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Kinji Ishikawa
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 6.  Patients with cardiac chest pain should call emergency services.

Authors:  Will T Roberts; Adam D Timmis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-09-29

Review 7.  Guidelines to reducing delays in administration of thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  W L Williams
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  The relationship between total ischemic time and mortality in patients with STEMI: every second counts.

Authors:  Umair Khalid; Hani Jneid; Ali Emin Denktas
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-06

Review 9.  Streptokinase. A pharmacoeconomic appraisal of its use in the management of acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J C Gillis; K L Goa
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  The causes of prehospital delay in myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Cornelia Gärtner; Linda Walz; Eva Bauernschmitt; Karl-Heinz Ladwig
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 5.594

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.