Literature DB >> 7774002

Indirect portography enhanced by nicardipine versus prostaglandin E1.

Y Inoue1, H Nakamura, H Akaji, K Yamasaki.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare nicardipine (NCR) and prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) for portal venous contrast enhancement on indirect portography in a retrospective study.
METHODS: One milligram of NCR, a calcium antagonist, was injected into the superior mesenteric artery just prior to portography in 18 patients who had undergone otherwise identical portography using 20 micrograms PGE1 36-279 (mean 133) days before. All 18 patients had liver tumors and showed no changes in portal vein status in the interim.
RESULTS: Using conventional film/screen angiography, NCR provided equally good portograms as PGE1 with respect to image density and image contrast. Systemic effects on blood pressure and heart rate were minimal and no other side effects were observed with NCR.
CONCLUSION: NCR is an inexpensive drug and is expected to provide well-contrasted, indirect portograms on conventional film/screen angiography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7774002     DOI: 10.1007/bf02807229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol        ISSN: 0174-1551            Impact factor:   2.740


  25 in total

1.  The use of prostaglandin E1 to enhance the angiographic visualization of the splanchnic circulation.

Authors:  L J Davis; J H Anderson; S Wallace; C Gianturco; E D Jacobson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Pharmacological evaluation of YC-93, a new vasodilator, in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  T Seki; T Takenaka
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Biopharm       Date:  1977-06

3.  Improvement of superior mesenteric and portal vein visualization with tolazoline.

Authors:  H C Redman; S R Reuter; W J Miller
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1969 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.016

4.  Digital celiac arteriography.

Authors:  P Rossi; G Simonetti; R Passariello; P Tempesta; B Pesce; P Pavone; M Castrucci
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Digital subtraction angiography of the portal venous system.

Authors:  W D Foley; E T Stewart; J R Milbrath; M SanDretto; M Milde
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Comparative pharmacokinetics of nicardipine hydrochloride, a new vasodilator, in various species.

Authors:  S Higuchi; Y Shiobara
Journal:  Xenobiotica       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 1.908

7.  Comparison of the effects of papaverine versus prostaglandin E1 on penile blood flow by color duplex sonography.

Authors:  L C Liu; C C Wu; L H Liu; C P Chiang; C H Huang; Y H Chou; L B Tan
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Coronary and systemic hemodynamic effects of nicardipine.

Authors:  C R Lambert; J A Hill; W W Nichols; R L Feldman; C J Pepine
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1985-03-01       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Determination of optimal time window for liver scanning with CT during arterial portography.

Authors:  O Graf; W I Dock; J Lammer; S Thurnher; K L Eibenberger; R Wildling; B Niederle; E K Lang; G Lechner
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Superior mesenteric angiography and blood flow measurement following intra-arterial injection of prostaglandin E1.

Authors:  R A Clark; D P Colley; E D Jacobson; R Herman; G Tyler; D Stahl
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.