Literature DB >> 7772002

Vaginal and speculum examination in medical curricula.

S Abraham1.   

Abstract

Medical students' perception of their own psychomotor skills and attitudes to different methods of teaching the gynaecological examination were studied. Students rated their physical skills poorly, only 7% feeling confident they could detect an abnormality and only 14% considering their ability to perform a Pap smear was good or very good. They rated their doctor/patient skills better, 55% considering they are good at conducting an examination with sensitivity and 67% at explaining to their patient what they were doing and why. Students' first preference for instruction was to examine patients in the Outpatient Clinic under the supervision of a doctor, a method experienced by most students on one occasion. The next preferred method was for students to work with 2 trained gynaecological assistants, acting as patient and instructor, with discussion of feelings and feedback (see Subjects and Methods). The option of student volunteers was a least favoured method but was cited as first preference by 5% of students. Over 25% of the female students considered volunteering for vaginal examination a 'possibility' if they were examined by a student of the same sex. Over 25% of males would 'possibly' volunteer for rectal examination only if the same sex was present. The comments by the students offer help in the future planning of teaching vaginal examination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7772002     DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1995.tb01832.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0004-8666            Impact factor:   2.100


  6 in total

1.  Self-reported comfort in athletic training of gender-specific and non-gender-specific injuries and issues.

Authors:  Jan L Drummond; Benito J Velasquez; Rhonda S Cross; Mary L Jones
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2005 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Development and validation of assessment measures for a newly developed physical examination simulator.

Authors:  Carla M Pugh; Patricia Youngblood
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Can gynaecology teaching associates provide high quality effective training for medical students in the United Kingdom? Comparative study.

Authors:  Sally Pickard; Paula Baraitser; Janice Rymer; Johanna Piper
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-12-13

4.  Knowledge, attitudes and practices on cervical cancer screening among the medical workers of Mulago Hospital, Uganda.

Authors:  Twaha Mutyaba; Francis A Mmiro; Elisabete Weiderpass
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  The effects of case-based team learning on students' learning, self regulation and self direction.

Authors:  Rita Rezaee; Leili Mosalanejad
Journal:  Glob J Health Sci       Date:  2015-01-26

6.  Willingness of medical students to be examined in a physical examination course.

Authors:  Manuel Burggraf; Julia Kristin; Alexander Wegner; Sascha Beck; Stephanie Herbstreit; Marcel Dudda; Marcus Jäger; Max Daniel Kauther
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 2.463

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.