Literature DB >> 7771369

A computer assisted photogrammetric analysis of soft tissue changes after orthodontic treatment. Part I: Methodology and reliability.

S E Bishara1, D M Cummins, G J Jorgensen, J R Jakobsen.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to use standardized facial photographs to compare the soft tissue profile changes in persons with Class II, Division 1 malocclusions who were treated with either an extraction or a nonextraction treatment modality. Ninety-one patients (44 extraction and 47 nonextraction) were evaluated with standardized facial photographs, available at pretreatment, posttreatment, and 2 years in retention. The photographs were digitized and displayed on a computer monitor. Thirty-eight landmarks (18 frontal and 20 lateral) were located. From these landmarks, 29 angular and linear dimensions (8 frontal and 21 lateral) were constructed. Descriptive and analytical statistics were used to compare the absolute dimensions, as well as the incremental changes, between the extraction and nonextraction groups. The present findings indicate that (1) Photographs allow for measurement of structures from a profile, as well as frontal orientations. (2) Measurement of profile changes from facial photographs appear to be fairly reliable but also have significant limitations. (3) Certain landmarks tended to be less reliable than others, e.g., subnasale and gnathion. In general, measurements from frontal photographs were more reliable than those obtained from lateral photographs and linear measurements were more reliable than angular measurements. (4) Changes in head posture within the cephalostat have an impact on vertical facial dimensions measured from frontal photographs. Horizontal dimensions were effected to a lesser degree. (5) Facial structures that lie closer to the camera appeared to be relatively larger than structures located farther from the camera. (6) The overall process of evaluating facial changes from photographs is both technique and operator sensitive. (7) More research specifically testing the photogrammetric method in a clinical setting is needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7771369     DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70107-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  8 in total

1.  Genome-wide linkage analysis for ocular and nasal anthropometric traits in a Mongolian population.

Authors:  Sun-Wha Im; Hyun-Jin Kim; Mi Kyeong Lee; Jae-hyuk Yi; Ganchimeg Jargal; Joohon Sung; Sung-il Cho; Jong-Il Kim
Journal:  Exp Mol Med       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 8.718

2.  The impact of extraction vs nonextraction treatment on soft tissue changes in Class I borderline malocclusions.

Authors:  Dimitrios Konstantonis
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Photometric Evaluation of Soft Tissue Changes in CLP Patients: Le Fort I Advancement Osteotomy (ALO) Versus Anterior Maxillary Distraction (AMD).

Authors:  Joby Paulose; Eldho Markose
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2013-08-30

4.  Thiazolidinedione use and the longitudinal risk of fractures in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Zeina A Habib; Suzanne L Havstad; Karen Wells; George Divine; Manel Pladevall; L Keoki Williams
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 5.958

5.  Photogrammetric reliability of frontal facial photographs with radiographs and anthropometric measurements.

Authors:  Gunjan Negi; Prasad Chitra
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2019-06-19

6.  Three-dimensional changes in the location of soft tissue landmarks following bimaxillary orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Gökhan Çoban; İbrahim Yavuz; Ahmet Emin Demirbaş
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 1.938

7.  Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue profile in 12-year-old southern Chinese.

Authors:  Cindi Sy Leung; Yanqi Yang; Ricky Wk Wong; Urban Hägg; John Lo; Colman McGrath
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 2.151

8.  Three-dimensional photographic analysis of the face in European adults from southern Spain with normal occlusion: reference anthropometric measurements.

Authors:  M L Menéndez López-Mateos; J Carreño-Carreño; J C Palma; J A Alarcón; C Menéndez López-Mateos; M Menéndez-Núñez
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 2.757

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.