Literature DB >> 7771031

Core cancer length in ultrasound-guided systematic sextant biopsies: a preoperative evaluation of prostate cancer volume.

D D Dietrick1, J E McNeal, T A Stamey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Evidence has been presented that biologic aggressiveness of prostate carcinoma increases with volume and that cancers less than 0.5 cc may be regarded as clinically insignificant for immediate treatment. We have analyzed the ability of core cancer length on needle biopsy to predict cancer volumes near the 0.5 cc threshold for distinction between incidental versus clinical carcinoma.
METHODS: Systematic sextant transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies were performed on 110 men who then underwent radical prostatectomy for adenocarcinoma. The core cancer length within each biopsy was compared with the volumes of clinical and incidental carcinomas in the prostatectomy specimen.
RESULTS: Among incidental (nonpalpable) cancers, 14% of those under 0.2 cc were detected, but 44% at 0.2 to 0.5 cc and 92% of those more than 0.5 cc were detected. Among clinically suspected carcinomas, 2 mm or longer core cancer length reliably predicted a cancer of 0.5 cc or larger, but among incidental cancers, it predicted a tumor of 0.2 cc or larger. A 3-mm core cancer length threshold predicted 0.5 cc for both groups. The high frequency of incidental cancers under 0.5 cc impaired the predictive value of multiple positive needle cores. Bilateral positive biopsy results indicated bilateral extension of clinical cancer in only 59% of cases.
CONCLUSIONS: A core cancer length of 3 mm or more on one or two needle biopsies reliably predicts cancer of clinically significant volume (0.5 cc or larger). The high detection frequency of smaller incidental carcinomas on biopsy impairs the reliability of volume estimation from multiple positive needle cores and mandates that treatment decisions be made with knowledge of core cancer length.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7771031     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)80119-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  8 in total

1.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasonography Fusion Prostate Biopsy Significantly Outperforms Systematic 12-Core Biopsy for Prediction of Total Magnetic Resonance Imaging Tumor Volume in Active Surveillance Patients.

Authors:  Chinonyerem Okoro; Arvin K George; M Minhaj Siddiqui; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Annerleim Walton-Diaz; Nabeel A Shakir; Jason T Rothwax; Dima Raskolnikov; Lambros Stamatakis; Daniel Su; Baris Turkbey; Peter L Choyke; Maria J Merino; Howard L Parnes; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 2.  Prospective evaluation of men with stage T1C adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  H B Carter; J Sauvageot; P C Walsh; J I Epstein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  Ultrasound findings are not useful for defining stage T1c prostate cancer.

Authors:  H Sanders; R el-Galley
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Prediction of significant cancer in men with stage T1c adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  H B Carter; J I Epstein
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Prognostic factors in prostate cancer.

Authors:  A Buhmeida; S Pyrhönen; M Laato; Y Collan
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2006-04-03       Impact factor: 2.644

Review 6.  Imaging and Markers as Novel Diagnostic Tools in Detecting Insignificant Prostate Cancer: A Critical Overview.

Authors:  Sergey Reva; Alexander Nosov; Roman Novikov; Sergey Petrov
Journal:  Int Sch Res Notices       Date:  2014-07-15

Review 7.  Transrectal ultrasound biopsy of the prostate: does it still have a role in prostate cancer diagnosis?

Authors:  Andrew Moe; Dickon Hayne
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-12

Review 8.  Use of Imaging to Optimise Prostate Cancer Tumour Volume Assessment for Focal Therapy Planning.

Authors:  David Eldred-Evans; Henry Tam; Andrew P T Smith; Mathias Winkler; Hashim U Ahmed
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 3.092

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.