Literature DB >> 776927

Evidence against the involvement of chemotaxis in swarming of Proteus mirabilis.

F D Williams, D M Anderson, P S Hoffman, R H Schwarzhoff, S Leonard.   

Abstract

Nonswarming and nonchemotactic mutants of Proteus mirabilis were isolated after mutagenesis with N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine or ultraviolet light. These mutants were used in experiments to determine if chemotaxis is involved in the swarming of P. mirabilis. Nonchemotactic mutants failed to form chemotactic bands in a semisolid casein hydrolysate medium, yet they swarmed on the same medium containing 1.5% agar. Nonswarming mutants were attracted towards individual amino acids and components of tryptose. In cross-feeding experiments, no evidence was obtained to indicate the production of a diffusable chemical repellent. In studies with the wild-type P. mirabilis, no clear-cut negative chemotaxis was seen even though three different assays were used and numerous chemicals were tested. Additional evidence against the involvement of chemotaxis in swarming comes from finding that dialysis does not interfere with swarming; swarm cells will swarm immediately when transferred to fresh media, and swarm cells will swarm on an agar-water medium supplemented with a surfactant. These data indicate that chemotaxis is not involved in the swarming of P. mirabilis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1976        PMID: 776927      PMCID: PMC233056          DOI: 10.1128/jb.127.1.237-248.1976

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  10 in total

Review 1.  Chemotaxis in bacteria.

Authors:  J Adler
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 23.643

2.  On the interplay of environmental factors affecting taxis and motility in Rhodospirillum rubrum.

Authors:  R K CLAYTON
Journal:  Arch Mikrobiol       Date:  1958

3.  Negative chemotaxis in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  W W Tso; J Adler
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli analysed by three-dimensional tracking.

Authors:  H C Berg; D A Brown
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1972-10-27       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Common mechanism for repellents and attractants in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  N Tsang; R Macnab; D E Koshland
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-07-06       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  A method for measuring chemotaxis and use of the method to determine optimum conditions for chemotaxis by Escherichia coli.

Authors:  J Adler
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1973-01

7.  Nonchemotactic mutants of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  J B Armstrong; J Adler; M M Dahl
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Negative chemotaxis in bacteria.

Authors:  R N Doetsch; W F Seymour
Journal:  Life Sci II       Date:  1970-09-22

9.  The influence of medium composition on the growth and swarming of Proteus.

Authors:  H E Jones; R W Park
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1967-06

10.  Chemotaxis in bacteria.

Authors:  J Adler
Journal:  Science       Date:  1966-08-12       Impact factor: 47.728

  10 in total
  16 in total

1.  Dynamic aspects of the structured cell population in a swarming colony of Proteus mirabilis.

Authors:  T Matsuyama; Y Takagi; Y Nakagawa; H Itoh; J Wakita; M Matsushita
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  The chemotaxis system, but not chemotaxis, is essential for swarming motility in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  M Burkart; A Toguchi; R M Harshey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-03-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Influence of Physical Effects on the Swarming Motility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Alexander Yang; Wai Shing Tang; Tieyan Si; Jay X Tang
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 4.  Pathogenesis of Proteus mirabilis Infection.

Authors:  Chelsie E Armbruster; Harry L T Mobley; Melanie M Pearson
Journal:  EcoSal Plus       Date:  2018-02

5.  Transcriptome of swarming Proteus mirabilis.

Authors:  Melanie M Pearson; David A Rasko; Sara N Smith; Harry L T Mobley
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 3.441

6.  Induction of tryptophanase in short cells and swarm cells of Proteus vulgaris.

Authors:  P S Hoffman; J O Falkinham
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Unique developmental characteristics of the swarm and short cells of Proteus vulgaris and Proteus mirabilis.

Authors:  J O Falkinham; P S Hoffman
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Chemotactic control of the two flagellar systems of Vibrio parahaemolyticus.

Authors:  N Sar; L McCarter; M Simon; M Silverman
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  The Helicobacter pylori chemotaxis receptor TlpB (HP0103) is required for pH taxis and for colonization of the gastric mucosa.

Authors:  Matthew A Croxen; Gary Sisson; Roberto Melano; Paul S Hoffman
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Ability of Proteus mirabilis to invade human urothelial cells is coupled to motility and swarming differentiation.

Authors:  C Allison; N Coleman; P L Jones; C Hughes
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.441

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.