Literature DB >> 7767393

Multicentre trial of antepartum low-dose anti-D immunoglobulin.

D Lee1, V I Rawlinson.   

Abstract

Routine antenatal Rh immunoprophylaxis would substantially increase the use of anti-D Ig in the U.K. As availability of anti-D Ig is one factor influencing a decision to introduce routine antenatal prophylaxis, a trial was undertaken to test the efficacy of a lower dose of anti-D Ig than that used in earlier studies. RhD-negative primigravidae were randomized as controls or recipients of two doses of 250iu of anti-D Ig given at 28 and 34 weeks gestation. Blood samples were tested at delivery and at 6 months postpartum for the presence of immune anti-D, and again later if results were equivocal. Nine (1.5%) out of 595 control patients had immune anti-D at follow-up at 6 months and later; 4 (0.78%) of 513 treated women were immunized. It was concluded that, while two doses of 250iu of anti-D Ig may reduce alloimmunization, they are not as effective as two doses of 500iu in a previous trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7767393     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3148.1995.tb00180.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfus Med        ISSN: 0958-7578            Impact factor:   2.019


  6 in total

Review 1.  The role of antenatal immunoprophylaxis in the prevention of maternal-foetal anti-Rh(D) alloimmunisation.

Authors:  Giancarlo Maria Liumbruno; Angelo D'Alessandro; Federica Rea; Vanessa Piccinini; Liviana Catalano; Gabriele Calizzani; Simonetta Pupella; Giuliano Grazzini
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  Routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis in women who are Rh(D) negative: meta-analyses adjusted for differences in study design and quality.

Authors:  Rebecca M Turner; Myfanwy Lloyd-Jones; Dilly O C Anumba; Gordon C S Smith; David J Spiegelhalter; Hazel Squires; John W Stevens; Michael J Sweeting; Stanislaw J Urbaniak; Robert Webster; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Targeted antenatal anti-D prophylaxis for RhD-negative pregnant women: a systematic review.

Authors:  Britta Runkel; Gregor Bein; Wiebke Sieben; Dorothea Sow; Stephanie Polus; Daniel Fleer
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Clinical value of different anti-D immunoglobulin strategies for preventing Rh hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn: A network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiaohui Xie; Qiurong Fu; Ziwei Bao; Yi Zhang; Dan Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Anti-D administration in pregnancy for preventing Rhesus alloimmunisation.

Authors:  Rosemary D McBain; Caroline A Crowther; Philippa Middleton
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-09-03

6.  Bias modelling in evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Rebecca M Turner; David J Spiegelhalter; Gordon C S Smith; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.483

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.