Literature DB >> 7762538

Economic evaluation of drug abuse treatment programs: methodology and findings.

M T French1.   

Abstract

Research has shown that drug abuse treatment can help many individuals. Yet funding is often lacking for treatment because these programs compete for scarce resources with other important and effective social programs. This study shows how drug abuse treatment programs can be made more attractive to decision makers and funding agencies by first highlighting why economic evaluation is a critical component of drug abuse treatment research. Next, an evaluation methodology is presented that can be followed by program staff and researchers. The evaluation methodology includes aspects of cost-and-outcome analysis, cost-effectiveness analysis, and benefit-cost analysis. Methods and findings are then discussed from most of the major economic evaluation studies of drug and alcoholism treatment. Lastly, guidelines for conducting future economic evaluations are presented along with suggestions for how the results can be used for policy purposes and program planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7762538     DOI: 10.3109/00952999509095233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse        ISSN: 0095-2990            Impact factor:   3.829


  5 in total

Review 1.  Family-based therapy for adolescent drug abuse: knowns and unknowns.

Authors:  T J Ozechowski; H A Liddle
Journal:  Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev       Date:  2000-12

2.  Can mentoring or skill training reduce recidivism? Observational study with propensity analysis.

Authors:  E A Blechman; A Maurice; B Buecker; C Helberg
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2000-09

3.  Benefit-cost analysis of addiction treatment: methodological guidelines and empirical application using the DATCAP and ASI.

Authors:  Michael T French; Helena J Salomé; Jody L Sindelar; A Thomas McLellan
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four treatment modalities for substance disorders: a propensity score analysis.

Authors:  Ramin Mojtabai; Joshua Graff Zivin
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  A randomized controlled efficacy trial of behavioral activation for concurrent stimulant use and sexual risk for HIV acquisition among MSM: project IMPACT study protocol.

Authors:  Matthew J Mimiaga; David W Pantalone; Katie B Biello; Tiffany Rose Glynn; Christopher M Santostefano; Jennifer Olson; Dana J Pardee; Jaclyn M W Hughto; Josibel Garcia Valles; Adam W Carrico; Kenneth H Mayer; Steven A Safren
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 3.295

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.