Literature DB >> 7762062

The relation between acute vascular and interstitial renal allograft rejection and subsequent chronic rejection.

J L van Saase1, F J van der Woude, J Thorogood, A A Hollander, L A van Es, J J Weening, J H van Bockel, J A Bruijn.   

Abstract

Chronic rejection of renal allografts is a major cause of late graft loss. However, time of onset, relation with acute early rejection episodes, and risk factors are largely unknown. We undertook a cohort study of 482 consecutive patients from a single center who received a cadaveric renal allograft between January 1983 and April 1991. During the first 3 months after transplantation, 76 (15.8%) patients developed vascular rejection and 115 (23.9%) developed interstitial rejection. One-year graft survival of patients without rejection, with interstitial rejection, and with vascular rejection was 87.8%, 87%, and 48.7%, respectively. Five-year graft survival was 73.5% for the group without rejection, 71.4% for patients with interstitial rejection, and 34.3% for patients with vascular rejection. The adjusted relative risk of graft loss was 4.92 (95% CI 3.25-7.43) for patients with vascular rejection and 1.27 (95% CI 0.80-2.02) for patients with interstitial rejection compared with patients without early rejection, taking the time dependency of the rejection events and prognostic factors into account. The incidence of vascular rejection was increased in patients with primary nonfunction (RR 1.69, 95% CI 1.01-2.84), with 1 HLA-DR mismatch (RR 2.38, 95% CI 1.44-3.93), with 2 HLA-DR mismatches (RR 3.24, 95% CI 1.25-8.42), with a prolonged cold ischemia time (RR 1.03, 95% CI 1.00-1.06 per hr), and with 1 or more previous transplantations (RR 1.76, 95% CI 1.01-3.07). Risk of developing vascular rejection was decreased in patients using CsA as compared with azathioprine (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.24-0.67). Early vascular rejection, occurring within 3 months after transplantation, is the most important predicting variable of both early and late graft loss. Use of CsA, less HLA-DR mismatching, and a cold ischemia time of short duration possibly prevent the development of vascular rejection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7762062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  12 in total

1.  Chronic kidney isograft and allograft rejection.

Authors:  Qun Yan; Peng Zhang; Chuanyong Yang
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2002

2.  Abrogation of chronic rejection in a murine model of aortic allotransplantation by prior induction of donor-specific tolerance.

Authors:  V Subbotin; H Sun; A Aitouche; L A Valdivia; J J Fung; T E Starzl; A S Rao
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1997-09-15       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 3.  Chronic rejection. A general overview of histopathology and pathophysiology with emphasis on liver, heart and intestinal allografts.

Authors:  A J Demetris; N Murase; R G Lee; P Randhawa; A Zeevi; S Pham; R Duquesnoy; J J Fung; T E Starzl
Journal:  Ann Transplant       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.530

4.  Analysis of chronic rejection and obliterative arteriopathy. Possible contributions of donor antigen-presenting cells and lymphatic disruption.

Authors:  A J Demetris; N Murase; Q Ye; F H Galvao; C Richert; R Saad; S Pham; R J Duquesnoy; A Zeevi; J J Fung; T E Starzl
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.307

5.  Reassessing the Significance of Intimal Arteritis in Kidney Transplant Biopsy Specimens.

Authors:  Israel D R Salazar; Maribel Merino López; Jessica Chang; Philip F Halloran
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 10.121

6.  Urinary expression of kidney injury markers in renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  Cheuk-Chun Szeto; Bonnie Ching-Ha Kwan; Ka-Bik Lai; Fernand Mac-Moune Lai; Kai-Ming Chow; Gang Wang; Cathy Choi-Wan Luk; Philip Kam-Tao Li
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 7.  The impact of age on rejection in kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Johan W de Fijter
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 8.  Mycophenolate mofetil. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and clinical efficacy in renal transplantation.

Authors:  B Fulton; A Markham
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 9.  Mycophenolate mofetil: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in solid organ transplantation.

Authors:  Melissa Young; Greg L Plosker
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  Prevalence and risk factors for early chronic allograft nephropathy in a live related renal transplant program.

Authors:  Hamid Khan; Muhammed Mubarak; Tahir Aziz; Ejaz Ahmed; Syed Fazal Akhter; Javed Kazi; Syed Aa Naqvi; Syed Ah Rizvi
Journal:  J Nephropathol       Date:  2014-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.