Literature DB >> 7760132

Somatosensory effects on neurons in dorsal cochlear nucleus.

E D Young1, I Nelken, R A Conley.   

Abstract

1. Single units and evoked potentials were recorded in dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN) in response to electrical stimulation of the somatosensory dorsal column and spinal trigeminal nuclei (together called MSN for medullary somatosensory nuclei) and for tactile somatosensory stimuli. Recordings were from paralyzed decerebrate cats. 2. DCN principal cells (type IV units) were strongly inhibited by electrical stimulation (single 50-microA bipolar pulse) in MSN or by somatosensory stimulation. Units recorded in the fusiform cell and deep layers of DCN were inhibited, suggesting that the inhibition affects both types of principal cells (i.e., both fusiform and giant cells). 3. Interneurons (type II units) that inhibit principal cells were only weakly inhibited by electrical stimulation and were never excited, demonstrating that the inhibitory effect on principal cells does not pass through the type II circuit. In the vicinity of the DCN/PVCN (posteroventral cochlear nucleus) boundary, units were encountered that were excited by electrical stimulation in MSN; some of these neurons responded to sound, and some did not. Their response properties are consistent with the hypothesis that they are deep-layer inhibitory interneurons conveying somatosensory information to the DCN. 4. Analysis of the evoked potentials produced by electrical stimulation in MSN suggests that the somatosensory inputs activate the granule cell system of the DCN molecular layer. A model based on previous work by Klee and Rall was used to show that the distribution of evoked potentials in DCN can be explained as resulting from radial currents produced in the DCN molecular and fusiform-cell layers by synchronous activation of granule cells inputs to fusiform and cartwheel cells. Current-source density analysis of the evoked potentials is consistent with this model. Thus molecular layer interneurons (cartwheel and stellate cells) are a second possible source of inhibition to principal cells. 5. With lower stimulus levels (20 microA) and pulse-pair stimuli (50- to 100-ms interstimulus interval), three components of the inhibitory response can be recognized in both fusiform cell layer and deep layer type IV units: a short-latency inhibition that begins before the start of the evoked potential; a longer-latency inhibition whose timing corresponds to the evoked potential; and an excitatory component that occurs on the rising phase of the evoked potential. The excitatory component is usually overwhelmed by the inhibitory components and could be derived from granule cell inputs; the long-latency inhibitory component could be derived from cartwheel cells or the hypothesized deep-layer inhibitory interneurons.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7760132     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1995.73.2.743

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  50 in total

1.  Transient potassium currents regulate the discharge patterns of dorsal cochlear nucleus pyramidal cells.

Authors:  P O Kanold; P B Manis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Proprioceptive information from the pinna provides somatosensory input to cat dorsal cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  P O Kanold; E D Young
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Dorsal cochlear nucleus response properties following acoustic trauma: response maps and spontaneous activity.

Authors:  Wei-Li Diana Ma; Eric D Young
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 4.  Multimodal inputs to the granule cell domain of the cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  David K Ryugo; Charles-André Haenggeli; John R Doucet
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-09       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Single-neuron recordings from unanesthetized mouse dorsal cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  Wei-Li Diana Ma; Stephan D Brenowitz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Molecular layer inhibitory interneurons provide feedforward and lateral inhibition in the dorsal cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  Michael T Roberts; Laurence O Trussell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Somatosensory context alters auditory responses in the cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  Patrick O Kanold; Kevin A Davis; Eric D Young
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) of upper cervical nerve (C2) for the treatment of somatic tinnitus.

Authors:  Sven Vanneste; Mark Plazier; Paul Van de Heyning; Dirk De Ridder
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  Dissecting neural circuits for multisensory integration and crossmodal processing.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Yau; Gregory C DeAngelis; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Amino acid and acetylcholine chemistry in mountain beaver cochlear nucleus and comparisons to pocket gopher, other rodents, and cat.

Authors:  Donald A Godfrey; Nikki L Mikesell; Timothy G Godfrey; James A Kaltenbach
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-11-10       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.