Literature DB >> 7760114

Efferent-mediated protection from acoustic overexposure: relation to slow effects of olivocochlear stimulation.

E R Reiter1, M C Liberman.   

Abstract

1. The present study attempts to resolve discrepancies in the reported role of olivocochlear (OC) efferent activation in protecting the inner ear from acoustic overstimulation: in previous studies, activating the OC system in guinea pigs reduced the threshold shift caused by 1 min monaural exposure to a 10-kHz tone; whereas unilateral OC activation in cats had no effect on threshold shifts following binaural exposure to a 10 min 6-kHz tone. 2. In this study, anesthetized and curarized guinea pigs were exposed either monaurally or binaurally to tones of different duration (1-5 min), frequency (6 to 10 kHz) and intensity (105-118 dB SPL). For each exposure condition, threshold shifts were compared among ears with different levels of OC activation: in some cases, the OC bundle (OCB) was electrically stimulated during (and/or before) the acoustic overexposure; in others, the OCB was cut before the exposure; in control cases, the OCB was neither cut nor electrically stimulated. 3. Electrical stimulation of the OCB delivered simultaneously with acoustic overstimulation produced significant reductions in threshold shift only for acoustic exposures at higher frequencies (8 and 10 kHz) and shorter durations (1 and 2 min). The protective effects on 1-min exposures could be extinguished by prior stimulation of the OCB, i.e., if the OC stimulation was turned on 4 min before the acoustic overexposure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7760114     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1995.73.2.506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  39 in total

1.  Cholinergic modulation of stellate cells in the mammalian ventral cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  K Fujino; D Oertel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Separate mechanical processes underlie fast and slow effects of medial olivocochlear efferent activity.

Authors:  N P Cooper; J J Guinan
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-02-28       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Old mice lacking high-affinity nicotine receptors resist acoustic trauma.

Authors:  Haiyan Shen; Zhaoyu Lin; Debin Lei; Josiah Han; Kevin K Ohlemiller; Jianxin Bao
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 4.  Protection from acoustic trauma is not a primary function of the medial olivocochlear efferent system.

Authors:  E Christopher Kirk; David W Smith
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-06-06

5.  Responses of medial olivocochlear neurons. Specifying the central pathways of the medial olivocochlear reflex.

Authors:  M C Brown; R K de Venecia; J J Guinan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The middle ear muscle reflex in the diagnosis of cochlear neuropathy.

Authors:  Michelle D Valero; Kenneth E Hancock; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Recording and labeling at a site along the cochlea shows alignment of medial olivocochlear and auditory nerve tonotopic mappings.

Authors:  M Christian Brown
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 8.  Modulation of hair cell efferents.

Authors:  Eric Wersinger; Paul Albert Fuchs
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-12-25       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Medial olivocochlear reflex interneurons are located in the posteroventral cochlear nucleus: a kainic acid lesion study in guinea pigs.

Authors:  Ronald K de Venecia; M Charles Liberman; John J Guinan; M Christian Brown
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2005-07-11       Impact factor: 3.215

Review 10.  Efferent-mediated control of basilar membrane motion.

Authors:  N P Cooper; J J Guinan
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.