OBJECTIVE: We have previously reported that low-density lipoproteins (LDL) isolated from patients with essential hypertension are more susceptible to in vitro oxidation than lipoproteins isolated from normotensive control subjects. In the present study we investigated the occurrence of in vivo LDL oxidation in hypertensive patients. DESIGN: The presence of antioxidatively modified LDL autoantibodies was taken as a suitable index of in vivo LDL oxidation because, after oxidative modifications, LDL express antigenic epitopes that elicit an immune response. The antibody titres were measured in plasma from untreated patients with newly diagnosed essential hypertension. METHODS: An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method was employed, using native LDL, Cu(2+)-oxidized LDL and malondialdehyde-derivatized LDL (MDA-LDL) as antigens. Human serum albumin and MDA human serum albumin were also used to monitor cross-reactivity with other oxidized molecules. The antibody titre was expressed as the ratio between anti-modified and anti-native antigen absolute values. RESULTS: The patients with essential hypertension had an antibody ratio significantly higher than control subjects with respect to anti-Cu(2+)-oxidized LDL immunoglobulins G and M, and with respect to anti-MDA-LDL immunoglobulins G and M. A significant positive correlation was found between anti-MDA-LDL and anti-Cu(2+)-oxidized LDL antibody titres. The anti-MDA human serum albumin antibody titre was not different in the two groups of patients. An inverse correlation was detected between the anti-MDA-LDL immunoglobulin M titre and the age of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained are consistent with the view that, during the early phases of hypertension development, LDL undergo in vivo oxidation that is mirrored by the generation of autoantibodies against epitopes of oxidized LDL. The oxidation process appears specific for LDL and might be relevant both for the progression of hypertension and for the development of the atherosclerosis that often complicates hypertension itself.
OBJECTIVE: We have previously reported that low-density lipoproteins (LDL) isolated from patients with essential hypertension are more susceptible to in vitro oxidation than lipoproteins isolated from normotensive control subjects. In the present study we investigated the occurrence of in vivo LDL oxidation in hypertensivepatients. DESIGN: The presence of antioxidatively modified LDL autoantibodies was taken as a suitable index of in vivo LDL oxidation because, after oxidative modifications, LDL express antigenic epitopes that elicit an immune response. The antibody titres were measured in plasma from untreated patients with newly diagnosed essential hypertension. METHODS: An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method was employed, using native LDL, Cu(2+)-oxidized LDL and malondialdehyde-derivatized LDL (MDA-LDL) as antigens. Human serum albumin and MDA human serum albumin were also used to monitor cross-reactivity with other oxidized molecules. The antibody titre was expressed as the ratio between anti-modified and anti-native antigen absolute values. RESULTS: The patients with essential hypertension had an antibody ratio significantly higher than control subjects with respect to anti-Cu(2+)-oxidized LDL immunoglobulins G and M, and with respect to anti-MDA-LDL immunoglobulins G and M. A significant positive correlation was found between anti-MDA-LDL and anti-Cu(2+)-oxidized LDL antibody titres. The anti-MDA human serum albumin antibody titre was not different in the two groups of patients. An inverse correlation was detected between the anti-MDA-LDL immunoglobulin M titre and the age of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained are consistent with the view that, during the early phases of hypertension development, LDL undergo in vivo oxidation that is mirrored by the generation of autoantibodies against epitopes of oxidized LDL. The oxidation process appears specific for LDL and might be relevant both for the progression of hypertension and for the development of the atherosclerosis that often complicates hypertension itself.
Authors: Peter Steer; Johannes Hulthe; Jonas Miligård; Dennis M Sarabi; Samar Basu; Bengt Vessby; Lars Lind Journal: Lipids Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 1.880
Authors: Jobert Richie Nansseu; Vicky Jocelyne Ama Moor; Ruth Danielle M Takam; Bertrand Zing-Awona; Marcel Azabji-Kenfack; Francine Tankeu; Corinne M Tchoula; Bruno M Moukette; Jeanne Y Ngogang Journal: BMC Res Notes Date: 2017-06-02