Literature DB >> 7759654

Thresholds for formant-frequency discrimination of vowels in consonantal context.

D Kewley-Port1.   

Abstract

Thresholds for formant frequency discrimination were shown to be in the range of 1%-2% by Kewley-Port and Watson [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 485-496 (1994)]. The present experiment extends that study and one by Mermelstein [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 63, 572-580 (1978)] to determine the effect of consonantal context on the discrimination of formant frequency. Thresholds for formant frequency were measured under minimal stimulus uncertainty for the vowel /I/ synthesized in isolation and in CVC syllables with the consonants /b/, /d/, /g/, /z/, /m/, and /l/. Overall, the effects of consonantal context were similar to those reported by Mermelstein (1978), although his threshold estimates were a factor of 4-5 times larger because less-than-optimal psychophysical methods had been used. Compared to the vowel in isolation, consonantal context had little effect on thresholds for F1 and a larger effect on F2. When a shift in threshold was observed, subject variability was high and resolution was degraded by as much as a factor of 2. Analyses of stimulus parameters indicated that resolution was degraded by shortening steady-state vowel duration or if the separation between the onsets of the formant transitions was small. Overall, consonantal context makes it more difficult for some, but not all, listeners to resolve formant frequency as accurately as for vowels in isolation.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7759654     DOI: 10.1121/1.413106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  1 in total

1.  Within-subjects comparison of the HiRes and Fidelity120 speech processing strategies: speech perception and its relation to place-pitch sensitivity.

Authors:  Gail S Donaldson; Patricia K Dawson; Lamar Z Borden
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.