Literature DB >> 7757465

Circulating adrenal hormones are not necessary for the development of sensitization to the psychomotor activating effects of amphetamine.

A Badiani1, M I Morano, H Akil, T E Robinson.   

Abstract

We reported previously that when amphetamine is given in NOVEL test cages both its acute psychomotor activating effects (rotational behaviour and locomotor activity) and the degree of sensitization are greater than when amphetamine is given in HOME cages that are physically identical to the NOVEL test cages. Since exposure to the NOVEL environment increases plasma corticosterone levels (Experiment 1) it is possible that the enhancement in the effects of amphetamine in the NOVEL condition is mediated by corticosterone. If this hypothesis is correct adrenalectomy (ADX) should abolish the difference between the HOME and NOVEL groups. This was tested in three independent experiments, in which the response (rotational behavior in Experiments 2 and 3; locomotor activity and rearing behavior in Experiment 4) to repeated injections of amphetamine was assessed in rats that underwent adrenalectomy (ADX) or a sham operation (SHAM). ADX animals received either no corticosterone replacement or one of two corticosterone replacement treatments. Adrenalectomy, with or without corticosterone replacement treatment, had no significant effect on the development of amphetamine sensitization, either in the HOME or the NOVEL environment. By contrast, the effects of adrenalectomy on the acute response to amphetamine varied depending on the behavioral measure and possibly on the dose of amphetamine (2.0 mg/kg, 3.0 mg/kg and 1.5 mg/kg IP, in Experiments 2, 3 and 4, respectively). We conclude that: (i) a stress-induced secretion of adrenal hormones is not responsible for the enhancement in sensitization to amphetamine seen in animals tested in a NOVEL environment; (ii) circulating adrenal hormones are not necessary for development of sensitization to the psychomotor activating effects of amphetamine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7757465     DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(94)01365-o

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  17 in total

1.  Progression of cellular adaptations in medial prefrontal and orbitofrontal cortex in response to repeated amphetamine.

Authors:  Houman Homayoun; Bita Moghaddam
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-08-02       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Food restriction enhances the central rewarding effect of abused drugs.

Authors:  S Cabeza de Vaca; K D Carr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  A single exposure to amphetamine is sufficient to induce long-term behavioral, neuroendocrine, and neurochemical sensitization in rats.

Authors:  L J Vanderschuren; E D Schmidt; T J De Vries; C A Van Moorsel; F J Tilders; A N Schoffelmeer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  The role of setting in the oral self-administration of alcohol in the rat.

Authors:  Arianna Testa; Paolo Nencini; Aldo Badiani
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Mifepristone treatment affects the response to repeated amphetamine injections, but does not attenuate the expression of sensitization.

Authors:  Rixt van der Veen; Marieke C S Boshuizen; E Ronald de Kloet
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Effect of adrenalectomy on the initiation and expression of cocaine-induced sensitization.

Authors:  B M Prasad; C Ulibarri; P W Kalivas; B A Sorg
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  The role of corticosterone in food deprivation-induced reinstatement of cocaine seeking in the rat.

Authors:  Uri Shalev; Michela Marinelli; Michael H Baumann; Pier-Vincenzo Piazza; Yavin Shaham
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2002-09-18       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Amphetamine-induced behavior, dopamine release, and c-fos mRNA expression: modulation by environmental novelty.

Authors:  A Badiani; M M Oates; H E Day; S J Watson; H Akil; T E Robinson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-12-15       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Individual differences in amphetamine sensitization, behavior and central monoamines.

Authors:  Jamie L Scholl; Na Feng; Michael J Watt; Kenneth J Renner; Gina L Forster
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2008-12-07

10.  Opposite environmental regulation of heroin and amphetamine self-administration in the rat.

Authors:  Daniele Caprioli; Michele Celentano; Giovanna Paolone; Federica Lucantonio; Andrea Bari; Paolo Nencini; Aldo Badiani
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.