Literature DB >> 7757204

Selectivity due to conformational differences between helical and non-helical peptides in reversed-phase chromatography.

T J Sereda1, C T Mant, R S Hodges.   

Abstract

The reversed-phase retention behaviour of two series of peptides, one non-helical and the other alpha-helical, was studied under various linear AB gradients in order to determine the effect of peptide conformation on selectivity of the separation. The non-helical series, designated X1, with the sequence Ac-XLGAKGAGVG-amide, exhibited negligible alpha-helical content in a hydrophobic medium; whereas, the amphipathic alpha-helical series, designated AX9, with the sequence Ac-EAEKAAKEXEKAAKEAEK-amide, exhibited high alpha-helical content in a hydrophobic medium. We have shown that plots of log k vs. phi (where k is the median capacity factor and phi is the median volume fraction of organic solvent) are very similar for any one peptide conformation, i.e., peptides from either the non-helical or amphipathic alpha-helical series exhibit similar S (solute parameter) values and the b (gradient steepness parameter) values are also similar for 17 different amino acid substitutions within each series of peptides. If mixtures of peptides from the two different series are separated using either increasing or decreasing gradient rates, large increases in resolution occur due to selectivity, which may be attributed to the difference in the log k vs. phi plots for each series of peptides. In addition, by using a polymer of an X1 peptide, which is 20 residues in length, it has been shown that the molecular mass difference between the X1 and the AX9 series of peptides is not sufficient to account for the selectivity difference. The S value of a non-amphipathic alpha-helical peptide further suggested that the difference in selectivity between the two series of peptides was due to differences in conformation. We believe that the peptide mixtures presented here provide a good model for studying selectivity effects due to conformational differences between peptides, an important concern when attempting to develop rational approaches to the prediction and optimization of peptide separation protocols from primary sequence information alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7757204     DOI: 10.1016/0021-9673(94)01147-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr A        ISSN: 0021-9673            Impact factor:   4.759


  6 in total

1.  Context-dependent effects on the hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity of side-chains during reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography: Implications for prediction of peptide retention behaviour.

Authors:  C T Mant; R S Hodges
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 4.759

2.  Improved peptide elution time prediction for reversed-phase liquid chromatography-MS by incorporating peptide sequence information.

Authors:  Konstantinos Petritis; Lars J Kangas; Bo Yan; Matthew E Monroe; Eric F Strittmatter; Wei-Jun Qian; Joshua N Adkins; Ronald J Moore; Ying Xu; Mary S Lipton; David G Camp; Richard D Smith
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2006-07-15       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Effect of anionic ion-pairing reagent concentration (1-60 mM) on reversed-phase liquid chromatography elution behaviour of peptides.

Authors:  M Shibue; C T Mant; R S Hodges
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 4.759

4.  The perchlorate anion is more effective than the trifluoroacetate anion as an ion-pairing reagent for reversed-phase chromatography of peptides.

Authors:  M Shibue; C T Mant; R S Hodges
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 4.759

5.  Effect of anionic ion-pairing reagent hydrophobicity on selectivity of peptide separations by reversed-phase liquid chromatography.

Authors:  M Shibue; C T Mant; R S Hodges
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 4.759

6.  Effect of ring size on conformation and biological activity of cyclic cationic antimicrobial peptides.

Authors:  Masoud Jelokhani-Niaraki; Leslie H Kondejewski; Laura C Wheaton; Robert S Hodges
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 7.446

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.